Optional Corrective Action Period Update at Harita Nickel

IRMA and Harita Nickel are providing this joint update to keep stakeholders informed about the status of the ongoing IRMA audit at Harita Nickel’s operations on Obi Island.

IRMA welcomes Harita Nickel’s commitment to transparency in communicating while the assurance process is still underway.

The on-site audit of Harita Nickel’s operation on Indonesia’s Obi Island took place over nine (9) days in April 2025.

Part of the Harita Nickel operation on Indonesia's Obi Island
Credit: TBP/Harita Nickel

A supplementary review of documents was conducted by independent audit firm SCS Global Services between June and September 2025. This review was requested by the audit firm and approved by IRMA, due to the complexity of the operations.

Harita Nickel is the first IRMA audit in Indonesia, and the first IRMA audit of an integrated mining and processing site–covering mining, processing, smelting, and associated facilities in a rapidly expanding industrial operation, illustrating the breadth and complexity of assessing such sites within the IRMA system.

In October, the draft audit report was shared by the auditors with IRMA and Harita Nickel. Following review, Harita Nickel has opted to use the optional corrective action period.

As a standard part of the IRMA assurance process, an optional corrective action period (up to 12 months) provides mine sites with the opportunity to drive change by implementing corrective actions, before public release of its audit results. Auditors then verify the implemented corrective actions before the final audit report is published. The majority of sites in the IRMA system have elected to undergo corrective actions prior to publishing their final audit report.  This reflects IRMA’s focus on continuous improvement, that assurance reports are not pass or fail grades, but detailed baselines that sites can use to strengthen performance over time.

Areas of focus during Harita Nickel’s optional corrective action period include:

  • Strengthened engagement and collaboration across relevant stakeholder groups and partners, including a focus on providing additional information to stakeholders regarding the dynamically changing characteristics of the site’s expanding operations, seeking further consultation on key areas such as:
    • emergency response plan updates,
    • reclamation and closure planning, and,
    • in coordination with the local government, on the ongoing resettlement and livelihood safeguarding process.
  • Continued development of staff skills and practices that support constructive and responsible ways of working, to ensure safe operational practices amid the site’s transition to an industrial park, focuses on maintaining a positive and safe working culture during a period of workforce expansion.
  • Ongoing refinement of environmental and social impact assessment approaches to better reflect the evolving nature of the broader operational environment. This comprises formal expectations of performance according to the IRMA standard and continual monitoring of impact areas included in IRMA chapters marked as relevant for the audit.

As of January 2026, specific projects include:

  • Implementation of a large-scale emergency response planning project in collaboration with a local university. As part of this project, the company has already conducted emergency drills with workers and local communities. Feedback from drill participants is being implemented to make further improvements, and drills and stakeholder discussions will be conducted periodically.
  • Implementation of a regular update of the site’s Human Rights Due Diligence plan in collaboration with a local NGO. This project includes alignment with IRMA-specific consultation and documentation procedures, and will ensure potentially required mitigation, and remediation efforts are conducted in coordination with affected stakeholders.

Of note: Preliminary audit findings show solid performance in certain areas and the site will work to maintain this level of performance over time:

  • Chapter 1.4 Complaints and Grievance Mechanism and Access to Remedy, demonstrating that the company implements:
    • suitable, accessible channels for communities, workers and other stakeholder to raise grievances anonymously or non-anonymously,
    • thorough documentation of complaints, associated remedies and grievance status.
  • Chapter 1.5 Revenue and Payments Transparency, including implementation of:
    • policies and procedures that prohibit bribery and other forms of corruption, and
    • training procedures for employees and contractors in the application of these policies and procedures.
  • Chapter 4.5 Greenhouse Gas Emissions, including:
    • emissions quantification according to widely accepted reporting standards,
    • meaningful emissions reduction targets,
    • a plan detailing actions to achieve these targets, including identification of emissions reduction opportunities, and
    • implementation of emissions reduction and avoidance measures.

Harita Nickel will provide periodic updates and further information as additional corrective actions are confirmed and implemented. The company is open to constructive feedback and inquiries related to its operations and the IRMA audit process.

To stay up to date on the IRMA independent assessment of the Harita Nickel operations by SCS Global Services, visit the Harita Nickel IRMA audit page.