Standards

Standards

New version of the IRMA Guidance Document available (V1.3)

The IRMA Guidance Document to the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining V1.0 has been updated.

This latest version (V1.3), is available in English, and can be found under our Resources webpage.

Minor modifications were made in this updated version (V1.3) to ensure continued improvement on clarity, and auditability. The changes made are non-substantive changes that do not alter the intent of any requirement, and are based on learning and experience from audits and implementation.

Summary of changes – V1.3:
Chapter 2.5—Emergency Preparedness and Response: Updated links to APELL for Mining and APELL Handbook
(2nd Edition) to ensure access to original documents is maintained.

Chapter 3.5—Security Arrangements: Updated the chapter relevance to clarify applicability to any situation wheresecurity personnel are used at, or could be expected to be deployed to, the mine site or associated facilities, or in relation to transportation of products or ore, regardless of the level of decision-making and control of the operating company over such deployment. The sole term “used” had inadvertently limited interpretation of the chapter and requirement relevancy in a manner contradictory to the original intent of this chapter. This has also been reflected in the language used in the relevant means of verification and explanatory notes. Replaced the term “public security providers” with “authorities in charge of public security forces” to ensure coverage of situations where public security forces are “deployed” in spite of a formal arrangement with the operating company to “provide” such forces.

Chapter 4.7—Cyanide Management: Updated expectations for non-gold/silver mines that are not eligible for ICMI certification.

Indigenous Peoples: Capitalized all occurrences of “Indigenous Peoples” and updated all references to “Indigenous Peoples living in voluntary isolation” to also use the internationally recommended term of “Uncontacted Indigenous Peoples”. See updated Glossary for more details on these terms. This is relevant to Chapters 2.2, 2.4, and 3.7. Clarified expectations in situations where Uncontacted Indigenous Peoples or Indigenous Peoples Living in Voluntary Isolation or Initial Contact may be affected.

Glossary: Removed broken links to the Glossary of the IRMA Standard, as well as references to an overall glossary “at the end of the document” that was not included. Updated definitions of ‘Indigenous Peoples’ to account for the more modern and inclusive approach used currently by IRMA. Added new definitions for ‘Indigenous Peoples in Initial Contact’, ‘Indigenous Peoples Living in Voluntary Isolation’, and ‘Uncontacted Indigenous Peoples’. Updated definition of ‘Worker’ to ensure management personnel are also included.

General: For consistency, clarified in the Explanatory Notes that where references to “certification” / “certified” / ”certify” by IRMA appears in the formal language of a critical requirement, failure to meet such requirement will not only prevent the company to achieve IRMA 100, but also to achieve any Achievement Level higher than IRMA Transparency. Updated contact details of IRMA Standards Director.

IRMA Policy on Association: Replaced all references and links to the draft Policy with references and links to the official version approved in October 2023 by IRMA Board of Directors.”

READ MORE
Chain of Custody

Responding to Market Demand, IRMA Releases Chain of Custody Standard

In September, IRMA’s equally-governed, multi-stakeholder board approved IRMA’s new Chain of Custody Standard (CoC Standard). The CoC Standard sets requirements for tracking material produced from mining operations audited against the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining, enabling consumer-facing brands and other actors along the supply chain to make credible claims that they are using materials from  IRMA-assessed mines.

Chain of Custody Standard v1.0 coverIRMA developed the CoC Standard and system in response to demands from consumer-facing brands and other companies for independently verified socially and environmentally responsible mined materials. Using specific requirements for tracking material from verified IRMA-audited mines and mineral processors, companies can better understand impacts in their supply chains, choose to buy from operators increasing transparency, and support their suppliers to improve practices.

The CoC Standard is also designed to be compatible with other standards programs that ensure responsible sourcing of mined materials downstream of the mine (e.g., ResponsibleSteel). In addition, IRMA developed the CoC Standard to work in concert with existing and emerging traceability services and technologies (e.g., block chain, mineral ID scanning, testing, etc.).

Based on the ISO 22095:2020 guidance, the CoC Standard allows for five different chain of custody models for chain of custody systems. Four models require and assure the actual physical presence of material with an IRMA Achievement Level: Identity Preserved, Segregated, Controlled Blending, and Mass Balance. One model is not connected to the physical flow of material, but an administrative record to ensure the quantity and achievement levels booked for materials from IRMA-assessed mines are not exceeded by the claims for those materials: Book and Claim Credits. Each model has specific requirements that allow different claims to be made about materials or products that are delivered using that chain of custody model.

“The release of the IRMA Chain of Custody Standard is an important milestone for Fairphone and the rest of the industry. This Standard enables us to provide independent proof that our responsible sourcing practices are in line with our material use responsibility: the Book and Claim Credits model provides a legitimate and workable solution for complex supply chains assuring we cover our material use with responsible production, whilst the Mass Balance model also assures the flow of these materials throughout the supply chain. At Fairphone, we look forward to piloting this standard to improve transparency and invite our industry peers to join.” – Lisa Minère, Project Manager Fair Mining at Fairphone.

“The lack of visibility into the origin of key metals in our renewable energy projects is a big hurdle to mapping and mitigating social and environmental risks in our metal supply chains. While increasing transparency has its challenges, it is possible and needed to advance our work to ensure responsible mined materials for the renewable energy transition. We support IRMA developing their new Chain of Custody Standard to work towards this goal.”– Joel Frijhoff, Sustainability Due Diligence Manager at Ørsted.

For More Information

READ MORE
Standards

Update on Standard for Responsible Mining 2.0

As we announced back in October, IRMA is comprehensively revising the 2018 IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining (1.0). This revision process allows IRMA to:

  • Remain accountable to all sectors
  • Remain up-to-date with best practice
  • Add clarity and strengthen auditability
  • Add consistency, and
  • Fill in gaps

Seeking as much as possible to align with ISEAL’s Code of Good Practice for Sustainability Systems, this revision process is informed by:

  • 5 years of ongoing stakeholder engagement
  • Experiences from the initial IRMA third-party audits
  • Review of other standards and initiatives
  • Increased public awareness and evolving expectations of best practice
  • Review of emerging issues garnering international discussions
  • Changes to relevant legislation across the full scope of the standard
  • Comments on previous drafts (IRMA-Ready, Mineral Processing, Chain of Custody)
  • Targeted engagement activities on specific topics
  • IRMA Expert working groups, and
  • Public consultation

Unlike the Standard 1.0 which only covers mineral extraction operations, the  IRMA Standard 2.0 is expected to also cover development, exploration, and mineral processing: the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining and Mineral Processing. Separately we will launch a Chain of Custody Standard.

Public Comments Received for the 1st Draft of IRMA Standard 2.0

The 90 day public consultation lasted from October 26 through January 26. During that time we:

  • Hosted 2 introductory webinars attended by 150 participants
  • Hosted 20 live topic consultation webinars — across multiple time zones — attended by 180 unique participants
  • Received 2,500+ discrete comments from 82 organizations, and
  • Allowed for additional engagement and feedback outside the formal process

The sector and geographic distributions of these 82 commenting organizations are shown below:

Regions from which Standard 2.0 public comments were submitted

 

Sectors from which IRMA received public comments on Standard 2.0 draft

Of the 28 chapters in first draft Standard 2.0, the most-commented upon were (in alphabetical order):

  • Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Protected Areas
  • Community and Stakeholder Engagement
  • ESIA (Environmental and Social Impact Assessment and Management)
  • Fair Labor and Terms of Work
  • Gender Equality and Gender Protections (new)
  • GHG and Energy Consumption
  • Human Rights Due Diligence
  • Indigenous Peoples and FPIC
  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Waste and Materials Management
  • Water Management

Public Comments Received for the second draft of the Chain of Custody Standard

A first draft was released for public comment in 2021. The 90 day public consultation for the second draft lasted from October 26 through January 26. During that time we:

Timeline

As included in the graphic below, the IRMA Secretariat is currently processing all the public comments received. Although subject to the approval of the IRMA Board of Directors, it is envisaged to release a 2nd draft for public comment in the second half of 2024. We hope to launch the actual Standard 2.0 – once approved by the IRMA Board of Directors – towards the end of 2024, thus triggering a transition period (duration to be decided and approved by the Board) between versions 1.0 and the 2.0 for all the entities and sites engaged (and seeking to engage) in the IRMA System.

Standard 2.0 revision timeline

READ MORE
ISO logoISO logoStandards

“Sustainable Critical Minerals Supply Chains” ISO Workshop

Share Your Experience: ISO Workshop on “Sustainable Critical Minerals Supply Chains” 16-17 April, New York City

RSVP with ISO for Virtual or In-Person Participation

IRMA is participating in a series of International Organization for Standardization (ISO) International Workshop Agreement (IWA) 45 sessions focused on “sustainable critical minerals supply chains.” ISO welcomes you to share your experience at the second session of IWA 45 this 16-17 April.

The series, hosted by Standards Australia, explores sustainability tools, guides, and frameworks available to “assist in improving an organization’s sustainability outcomes.” Following a first in-person only session held in Tokyo, Japan, the second IWA 45 session aims to broaden stakeholder engagement, including by enabling both in-person and virtual participation in the New York City session.

The IWA 45 series is important as it will inform the work of the ISO and the national standards bodies of its member countries, including, for example, work under ISO/PC 348 to specify criteria for sustainable raw materials from extraction to final product manufacturing.


For More Information:

READ MORE
Credit: Nick Youngson CC BY-SA 3.0 Pix4freeCredit: Nick Youngson CC BY-SA 3.0 Pix4freeStandards

The IRMA Standards revision — an update

IRMA would like to warmly thank all the people who have participated in the public-comment period that ended on 26 January to inform the revision of our Standards.

Through our live consultation webinars, our online platform, and direct engagement, we have collected about 2,000 individual lines of comments, submitted by more than 80 organizations spread across all continents (Asia, Africa, North America, South America, Europe, and Australia).

Building upon 5 years of implementation, learning, and continuous stakeholder engagement on the Standard, the IRMA Secretariat is now consolidating and processing all these comments and recommendations. Additional Expert Working Groups are being convened where necessary.

Subject to the approval of IRMA’s equally-governed multi-stakeholder Board, we hope to launch the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining and Mineral Processing V2.0  before the end of the year, together with a public report on the comment period and the rationale for the final changes made and approved. We hope to also launch the IRMA Chain of Custody Standard this year, also subject to Board’s approval.

READ MORE
Credit: Dick Thomas Johnson-CCBY2.0Credit: Dick Thomas Johnson-CCBY2.0Standards

ISO, responsible mining, and multi-stakeholder engagement

As the ISO takes on important work on responsible mining, IRMA restates the importance of inclusive and meaningful multi-stakeholder engagement

On 15-16 February 2024 in Tokyo, Japan, IRMA participated in the first working session of the ISO IWA 45, an international working agreement on “sustainable critical mineral supply chains.” This project is led by Standards Australia (Australia’s national standardization body) under the auspices of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and is tasked to “understand the range of sustainability tools/guides/frameworks available which will assist in improving an organization’s sustainability outcomes.” ISO is a quasi-governmental organization dedicated to standard development, headquartered in Switzerland and composed of the national standards bodies of its member countries.

This workshop was an in-person-only event which, while providing constructive opportunity for people to connect directly, dramatically reduced the number and diversity of stakeholders affected by mining and mineral value chains to participate. There were about 45 participants, with a majority from industry (mining and mineral processing) and consultants to the private sector, followed by government delegations (including national standardization bodies and state agencies or research institutions). The most represented countries were the United States, Canada, China, and Japan.

Articulating the perspectives of our members from six houses—affected communities, downstream purchasers, investment and finance, mining industry, NGOs, and organized labor—IRMA worked actively in the session to integrate the perspectives of civil society and organized labor, as those groups were not in attendance. We are concerned about how their absence might leave a significant gap in this process and encourage the event organizers to increase this outreach.

The working session opened with a summary of the results obtained from a preliminary survey circulated by Standards Australia in January 2024. Of the 115 full responses received, two-thirds came from the mining and mineral processing industry, 7% from NGOs, and 7% from academia. Most of the responses originated from China and Canada (over 10%), followed by the U.S., the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, Germany, South Africa, and Sweden; other countries were all under 3%.

Given the survey feedback was foremost from industry, the main insights shared by the workshop organizer reflected the positions of industry representatives who engaged in the survey, including the “proliferation,” “overlap,” and “inefficiency” of sustainability standards, the “confusion” they would create, and the “burden” created by assurance mechanisms that would be “significant, costly, and time-consuming”.

It is worth noting that IRMA has never heard civil society or mine workers complain that “assurance processes are too expensive,” but rather that they see need for increased investment in transparent sharing of information on performance and for improved practices. We hope that Standards Australia will be able to soon provide a breakdown of the responses by stakeholder groups and increase outreach to civil society, Indigenous rights holders, and labor leaders.

IRMA emphasized throughout the workshop the importance of inclusive and meaningful multi-stakeholder engagement for ISO to ensure robustness and credibility in its processes and its efforts to standardize responsible business practice. A number of other participants similarly asked for more proactive and targeted outreach to all stakeholder groups. The issue of inclusive and meaningful multi-stakeholder engagement was then selected by the organizer as the final topic for plenary discussion.

As currently designed, IWA and ISO processes, including IWA 45, are not inclusive for affected communities, NGOs, and organized labor, and do not allow for meaningful multi-stakeholder engagement. We ask that this fundamental gap be identified as the top priority in the final report that will be produced by Standards Australia this year, including as a key recommendation to inform the other ongoing ISO committees and workstreams on responsible mining and sustainable mineral value chains.

 

Photo credit: Dick Thomas Johnson CCBY2.0

READ MORE
Cover of IRMA Draft Standard 2.0 Proposed Normative Requirements for Exploration, Development and Mineral ProcessingCover of IRMA Draft Standard 2.0 Proposed Normative Requirements for Exploration, Development and Mineral ProcessingStandards

Std 2.0 and Exploration, Development & Processing

The IRMA Draft Standard for Responsible Mining and Mineral Processing 2.0 incorporates the draft IRMA Standard for Responsible Mineral Development and Exploration (the ‘IRMA-Ready’ Standard – Draft v1.0 December 2021), the draft IRMA Standard for Responsible Minerals Processing (Draft v1.0 June 2021), and the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining 1.0 (2018) into one integrated standard that covers all phases and types of mineral development activities.

The 2023 proposed revisions for version 2.0 are meant to apply at any phase of the mineral development life cycle (e.g., exploration, project development, permitting, construction, mining and processing operations, reclamation and closure, post-closure).

To highlight and clarify those additions, we have released a summary of the draft Normative Requirements for those phases — where IRMA requirements are modified to govern stages of exploration, development or mineral processing.  The IRMA Draft Standard 2.0 Normative Requirements for each chapter are provided and discussed in Appendix A.

In the context of this guidance document, a normative requirement modifies a given IRMA requirement from the IRMA DRAFT Standard 2.0 for a specific phase, by either replacing or  supplementing the original text of this requirement. We use the terminology “normative requirements” here since they modify the elements that would actually be required and that auditors would measure against, not just guidance that helps to enrich or guide understanding of those requirements.

These Normative Requirements are part of the Draft Standard 2.0, so just as with the rest of the draft Standard, they are proposed and open for public comment until January 26, 2024.

READ MORE

Topic consultations for draft Standard 2.0

Over the next two months IRMA is hosting live, virtual consultations to discuss and comment on different topics covered by the Draft Standard for Responsible Mining and Mineral Processing 2.0. Facilitated by the IRMA Secretariat, these virtual meetings share what you need to know about the proposed changes and/or new areas in a specific topic inside the Standard (download or view specific chapters here). They will ask some guided questions where IRMA especially seeks feedback. And we encourage all comments — these Zoom sessions are meant to be inclusive and collaborative spaces for such discussion.

All consultations will be in English and last for 60 minutes. Registration is required, all times are UTC-0. Please register through the links provided below for any topics you might be interested in. NOTE: all consultations below are for the Standard for Responsible Mining and Mineral Processing. Visit the Chain of Custody Standard page for those webinars.

2023 2024
07 December 14:00-15:00
Water Management
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
10 January 09:00-10:00
Sector-specific: Mineral Processing
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
08 December 14:00-15:00
Gender Equality & Gender Protections
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
10 January 17:00-18:00
Sector-specific: Exploration and Development
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
11 December 14:00-15:00
Occupational Health & Safety
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
11 January 16:00-17:00
Sector-specific: Mining Companies
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
11 December 16:00-17:00
Waste & Materials Management (incl. tailings)
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
12 January 07:00-08:00
Water Management

🔗 Presentation
12 December 14:00-15:00
GHG Emissions & Energy Consumption
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
12 January 14:00-15:00
Land & Soil Management
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
12 December 16:00-17:00
Indigenous Peoples & FPIC
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
15 January 07:00-08:00
Occupational Health & Safety
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
13 December 14:00-15:00
Management of Physical Stability (incl. tailings)
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
16 January 07:00-08:00
Waste and Materials Management (including tailings)
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
14 December 14:00-15:00
Planning, Financing Reclamation and Closure
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
18 January 07:00-08:00
Management of Physical Stability (including tailings)
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
18 December 14:00-15:00
Land Acquisition, Displacement, and Resettlement
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
19 January 07:00-08:00
GHG Emissions & Energy Consumption
Watch the recording
🔗 Presentation
READ MORE