Government

released its Lighthouse case guidance report which “presents a review of 10 selected cases, that could be considered cases of more leading practice, where affected people have been more effectively integrated in assurance processes and demonstrate replicable and effective approaches to rightsholder
engagement.” Prefacing the case studies, the report notes that:

“Ten cases of more leading practice were selected based on eligibility, effectiveness and adaptability or replicability. Further research and interviews were then conducted to deepen the understanding of each case. The Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) is disproportionately represented in the case sample, as the identification of cases of more leading practice relied heavily on publicly available audit reports. IRMA publishes more comprehensive and transparent audit reports than many other assurance schemes in the minerals sector, which contributed to its greater representation.“

released its National Critical Minerals Strategy (Estrategia Nacional de Minerales Críticos or EMC) “to respond to the challenges of the growing increase in global demand for minerals, driven by the global energy transition.” In support of the Strategy’s “Pillar 2: Responsible Mining of Critical Minerals” it says (NOTE: the document and quotes are all originally in Spanish, English quotes are machine translated):

“In recent decades, mining in Chile has moved towards a more responsible model aligned with the principles of sustainable development, incorporating increasingly demanding environmental, social, and governance standards. Oversight has been strengthened through more efficient monitoring and compliance systems, reinforcing the credibility of the regulatory framework in the eyes of citizens and international markets. The private sector has played a key role in this transition, with some companies voluntarily adopting international certifications such as IRMA (The Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance).”

“These advances have made it possible to progressively align national mining production with the growing demands for traceability and sustainability in global supply chains, boosting the competitiveness of the industry. This process, supported by the convergence of public-private efforts, has consolidated advances that position Chile as a relevant player in responsible mining, seeking to reconcile the exploitation of resources with the protection of the environment and the well-being of communities.”

released The Role of Traceability in Critical Mineral Supply Chains. The report recognizes the value of IRMA’s integrated approach to chain of custody:

“Some chain of custody standards, such as those by the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance […], go beyond traceability by integrating performance requirements that ensure responsible practices at the mine or processor of origin. The reliability of this information is crucial, with growing attention on these initiatives’ governance systems, oversight models, and approaches to information and external accountability.”

Pete Vowles visited Anglo American’s IRMA 75 achieving Unki mine — the first mining operation in Africa to be audited against the IRMA Standard.

After the visit Ambassador Vowles recognized Unki as the only platinum mine in Zimbabwe to [be audited] against the IRMA Standard, calling it “mining done right.“

and Levin Sources on behalf of Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development published Voluntary Sustainability Standards and Mineral Sector Governance: Synergies and Practices.

The report repeatedly highlights that IRMA stands apart from other voluntary standards in how it actively engages with and informs government authorities, before, during, and after audits. For example, it uses IRMA’s interaction with Indonesian authorities as a case study in how “voluntary  standards can engage in partnerships with governments and a range of stakeholders and rightsholders to improve responsible practices in the mining sector. IRMA’s engagement in Indonesia revolves around this concept.”

published “BC First Nations Critical Minerals Strategy.”

Recommendation 19 of the strategy says “First Nations, in their sole and absolute discretion, may require all mineral projects, including critical minerals projects, be assessed and audited by the world’s leading mining standard created by the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (“IRMA”). The IRMA audit process is transparent, independent and voluntary. The IRMA process is analogous to forest certification processes, such as the Forest Stewardship Council. Industry mining standards and certification schemes are biased processes and not supported by most First Nations.”

on Mining Laws, Regulations and Permitting published its “Recommendations to Improve Mining on Public Lands”

It positively calls out the IRMA Standard for special attention among voluntary mining standards, “This report endorses the adoption of a number of components of voluntary standards—particularly ones from the IRMA standard developed by a multi-stakeholder coalition comprised of the mining industry, end-users, environmental and human rights NGOs, labor organizations, and others.”

on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises published a report on The Extractive sector, just transition and human rights.

The report highlights three examples of responsible mining practices, and only one voluntary mining standard: IRMA. (page 14)

published a policy paper: “Resilience for the Future: The UK’s Critical Minerals Strategy.”

In the section titled “Resilience Through ESG Performance,” IRMA is listed as a globally recognized framework which could contribute to “role model standards for sustainable development of resources in the UK” and “protect the interests of communities and our natural environment.”