Academia, labor unions, indigenous communities, environmental and social nonprofits, purchasers, mining companies, investors, and governments and experts in the field have referenced and are referencing IRMA in their communications.
- 2024
- 2023
- 2022
- 2021
- 2020
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
Public Citizen and other organizations sent a letter to the ICMM, CopperMark, the Mining Association of Canada, and the World Gold Council expressing concerns over their Consolidated Mining Standard Initiative.
In doing so they “recognize that strong voluntary standards can help drive improved mining industry human rights and environmental performance if they have the level of transparency and rigor necessary to provide credible information,” and provides criteria that such a standard must meet.
As an example, the letter recognizes only IRMA by name: “There are existing standards, notably IRMA, that meet many of these criteria.”
The Just Transition Finance Lab at the London School of Economics submitted comments to the UN Secretary-General’s Panel on Critical Energy Transition Minerals in response to the Panel’s call for input to inform its development of principles and actionable recommendations.
The comments uniquely highlight IRMA “for its assurance system that includes public notice of audits in a sustained effort to hear all voices, and makes use of offsite audit interviews to acquire a holistic view of mine performance.” It also mentions that “IRMA’s governance is uniquely aligned with the just transition principle of centering the voices of affected workers and communities …. Most other standards only involve stakeholders outside of the mining sector through more detached consultation processes. A systematic and comprehensive overview of global mining standards found IRMA to have among the highest quality of governance structure, auditing and transparency.”
Eramet announced its Centenario direct lithium extraction plant in Argentina.
In doing so Eramet restated its commitment to “subject all its mining operations to an independent audit process based on the IRMA Standard. It is the first international standard for the mining sector with a global approach, including environmental, social and governance aspects of mining operations. By engaging stakeholders from various sectors, including communities, NGOs and industry experts, IRMA ensures a holistic perspective that addresses diverse concerns and promotes transparency throughout the mining supply chain. The Centenario site completed its self-assessment in 2022 and is preparing for an external audit scheduled for the beginning of 2025.”
Mighty Earth released a new report “The Impact of the Bauxite Boom on People and the Planet.”
In the accompanying press release “Mighty Earth calls for all actors across the bauxite supply chain to join the Initiative for Responsible Mining (IRMA) and adopt its standards. IRMA is the only independent third-party program for assessing industrial scale mine sites for all mined materials. It is governed equally by the private sector, communities, civil society, and workers.”
Tesla published its “Impact Report 2023.”
It declares that “The Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) Standard is Tesla’s preferred mining standard. IRMA is a multi-stakeholder led organization with the most comprehensive mining certification system and transparent reporting of results available. Its focus on continuous improvement allows suppliers to improve their results over time. Tesla has been an IRMA member since late 2021. Our goal is to encourage the uptake of IRMA across our supply chain.”
Rainforest Foundation Norway and AidEnvironment released the report “Short Circuits: Exploring the broken links of mineral supply chain policies in the electric vehicle industry.”
In looking at third-party assurance, the report highlights that “only the IRMA standard is contingent on FPIC.” With respect to mining and sensitive ecosystems, the report mentions “the IRMA mining standard expands those commitments [not to mine in legally protected areas] by establishing as a requirement that mining projects should not adversely affect IUCN protected area management categories I-III, and core areas of UNESCO Biosphere reserve.”
The Business & Human Rights Resource Center published “Transition Minerals Tracker: 2024 Analysis.”
The report declares “The standard developed by the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) represents the most comprehensive, transparent, and credible mining sector audit standard available today.”
The Church of England Pension Fund issued a “Statement on Anglo American and Proposed Take-Over Bids.”
The statement explained “Anglo has played a distinct role in driving best practice and was one of the first to support institutional investor calls for a different approach following the Brumadinho tailings disaster. It recognised that the social license of the sector was under threat and that the key to addressing challenging issues and building trust required multi-stakeholder approaches. It is also Anglo that has championed the development of a multi-stakeholder approach to standards through initiatives such as IRMA.”
87 Indigenous Peoples’ representatives issued the Declaration of Indigenous Peoples’ Participants in the Conference on Indigenous Peoples and the Just Transition.
The declaration includes “Companies must recognize and respect the right to FPIC, which also means the right to say no, in their policies, procedures and practices in all projects, recognizing and emphasizing the self-determined development of Indigenous Peoples. The International [sic] Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) policy on FPIC must be the minimum standard for mining companies.”
The United Nations Secretary-General appointed a Panel on Critical Energy Transition Minerals.
Composed of representatives of state and non-state actors, IRMA was included alongside other non-state actors such as the World Bank and IRMA member IndustriALL Global Union.
Cultural Survival, an Indigenous led NGO, issued a press release “Ford Sustainability Report Shows Important Progress on the Rights of Workers and Indigenous Peoples but Disappoints on Clean Steel and Aluminum.”
The release declares that “Sourcing from an IRMA-audited mine is a step in the right direction, but Ford can and should do more to leverage its influence to safeguard its supply chain from human rights and environmental harms. The next step for Ford is to publicly disclose its timeline for demanding that all mines in its supply chain undergo IRMA audits.”
39 civil society organizations submitted a letter in response to a “Request for Comments on Promoting Supply Chain Resilience” by the United States Trade Representative.”
The letter requests the USTR to “ensure that critical minerals operations meet all standards set in the Indigenous Peoples and Free, Prior and Informed Consent chapter of IRMA.” The letter also calls on the USTR to require the IRMA Occupational Health. & Safety chapter, as well as “all environmental responsibility and other related standards set in IRMA.”
Mighty Earth published “From Forests to Electric Vehicles: Quantifying and Addressing the Environmental Toll of Indonesian Nickel.”
The first recommendation of the report includes “we strongly encourage all actors to join the Initiative for Responsible Mining (IRMA) and adopt its standards. IRMA is the only independent third-party program for assessing industrial-scale mine sites for all mined materials. It is governed equally by the private sector, communities, civil society, and workers.”
Lead the Charge, a network of 14 local, national, and global advocacy partners submitted a letter to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) urging them to strengthen their upcoming supply chain standard.
Part of the letter strongly endorses IRMA, “There are fundamental criteria that standards must include to be credible and effective at protecting people and the planet. The Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) contains these elements and more, which is why there is broad consensus within civil society that IRMA is the strongest mining standard and should serve as the baseline for any global guideline on critical mineral supply chains.”
BC First Nations Energy and Mining Council (FNMEC) published “BC First Nations Critical Minerals Strategy.”
Recommendation 19 of the strategy says “First Nations, in their sole and absolute discretion, may require all mineral projects, including critical minerals projects, be assessed and audited by the world’s leading mining standard created by the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (“IRMA”). The IRMA audit process is transparent, independent and voluntary. The IRMA process is analogous to forest certification processes, such as the Forest Stewardship Council. Industry mining standards and certification schemes are biased processes and not supported by most First Nations.”
Transportation & Environment published a memo “EU Battery Regulation – Due diligence rules: what next in the implementation?”
The memo’s recommendations to companies include “Source from IRMA-audited mines, directly or indirectly.”
Lead the Charge , a diverse network of local, national and global advocacy partners working for an equitable, sustainable, and fossil-free auto supply chain released “The Race to Cleaner Automotive Supply Chains,” a scorecard of major automobile manufacturers’ supply chains assessing their environmental, human rights, and responsible sourcing performance.
In addition to using commitment to IRMA as part of the scoring rubric, the methodology of the scorecard offers that “to drive change at the level of extraction companies may join the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA). IRMA is the only third-party certification of industrial scale mine sites for all mined materials that is governed equitably by the private sector, local communities, civil society, and workers.”
29 investors managing US$1.2 trillion signed a statement demanding companies enhance their environmental and social due diligence in nickel supply chains of the electric vehicle industry.
The 29 signatories endorsed VBDO and Rainforest Foundation Norway’s investor statement which uniquely mentions IRMA as “one key initiative in this area which downstream companies can support by joining directly but also by prioritising sourcing from mines audited by IRMA and requiring their own suppliers to be audited by IRMA.”
Lead the Charge, a network of 14 local, national, and global advocacy partners published “An Assessment of Third-Party Assurance and Accreditation Scheme.”
Lead the Charge assessed IRMA as a “robust scheme” that “was the strongest performer by a considerable margin” among the eight systems evaluated, and meets “nearly all of the minimum criteria for governance, auditing, and/or accreditation.”
IndustriALL Global Union published a Mining Indaba recap “Reflecting on labour and community gains at the Mining Indaba.”
The recap described IRMA as “a valuable tool which integrated ILO standards, OECD guidelines and human rights due diligence. This integration created a culture of industrial peace, accountability, and meaningful dialogue between workers, communities, and mining companies.”
Transportation & Environment authored the study, “Pedal to the Metal: how prepared are European carmakers for EV value chain transformation.” “To Decarbonize We Must Invest in the U.S. EV Battery Supply Chain.”
One of the study’s “Key recommendations” is “quicker adoption of best-in-class global standards (such as IRMA),” the only mining standard mentioned. A company’s commitment to the IRMA Standard is used as part of the study’s “Responsible supply chain practices” metric.
Recourse and Trend Asia published “Tread Lightly: Why IFIs should put people and the environment at the centre of the transition mineral supply chain.”
One of the study’s “Key recommendations” is “quicker adoption of best-in-class global standards (such as IRMA),” the only mining standard mentioned. A company’s commitment to the IRMA Standard is used as part of the study’s “Responsible supply chain practices” metric.
The IUCN | National Committee of the Netherlands published an article “How the IRMA standard guides sectors towards responsible mining.”
The article “urges the public and business sectors in The Netherlands, the European Union and elsewhere to adhere to the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining, with an eye for the interests of both nature and people.”
Transportation & Environment , tagline “Europe’s leading clean transport campaign group,” released a briefing report “Paving the way to cleaner nickel.”
The briefing recommends “robust standards” naming only IRMA “to improve environmental and social stewardship.”
Rocky Mountain Institute authored an opinion piece in eGreenews[i]: “To Decarbonize We Must Invest in the U.S. EV Battery Supply Chain.”
As RMI discusses how to meet U.S. domestic electric vehicle battery demand, they unequivocally endorse IRMA, “Any extraction must be done responsibly and meet the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA)’s responsible mining standard.”
Oxfam America released a report “Recharging Community Consent: Mining companies, battery minerals, and the battle to break from the past” which concludes “in general the battery mineral sector’s approach to free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) is not sufficiently ready to support a just energy transition under current company policies.”
To address this unreadiness, Oxfam unequivocally endorses IRMA, “Major lithium producers need to be recognized as being some of the first to undertake credible, third-party assurance of their social and environmental performance, including FPIC implementation, in accordance with the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA).” It also gives kudos to those lithium producers that have audited their operations against the IRMA Standard.
The Alliance for Tompotika (AlTo) released a video – “Tompotika: Forests Nickel and Critical Choices” — highlighting the pressure of increasing nickel demand on Indonesia’s Tompotika tropical rainforest on Sulawesi and the threat it poses to critically endangered species.
To the extent that mining must occur in Tompotika, in the video AlTo says it “must occur according to mining best practices by applying the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining.”
The Biden-Harris Interagency Working Group on Mining Laws, Regulations and Permitting published its “Recommendations to Improve Mining on Public Lands”
It positively calls out the IRMA Standard for special attention among voluntary mining standards, “This report endorses the adoption of a number of components of voluntary standards—particularly ones from the IRMA standard developed by a multi-stakeholder coalition comprised of the mining industry, end-users, environmental and human rights NGOs, labor organizations, and others.”
The Berkeley Center for Law, Energy and the Environment (CLEE), and Ceres , an NGO working with capital market leaders to solve world sustainability challenges, published “Electric Vehicle Batteries: A Guidebook for Responsible Corporate Engagement Throughout the Supply Chain.”
The Ceres/CLEE guidebook recommends that EV battery manufacturers “Indicate a preference for batteries with minerals from IRMA-certified suppliers” and “Become a member of IRMA [to] publicly demonstrate a commitment to responsible sourcing.”
Climate Action 100+ , an investor-led initiative to ensure the world’s largest corporate greenhouse gas emitters take necessary action on climate change, published “Investor Expectations for Diversified Mining.”
In section 9.iii “Aligning with core best practices for the acceleration for of [transition mineral] mining” they suggest “that IRMA be considered the primary independent responsible mining [verification] when assessing indicator 9.iii because of its multistakeholder governance system that specifically allocates equal governing power to each of the represented stakeholders: communities, workers, NGOs, mining companies, companies that purchase mined materials, and investors.”
The University of Technology, Sydney (UTS) researchers Rusty Langdon and Elsa Dominish posted about “The Energy Conundrum” to answer the question “We could need 6 times more of the minerals used for renewables and batteries. How can we avoid a huge increase in mining impacts?”
Langdon and Dominish answered this question in part by referencing their research which “identified the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance as one of the more rigorous standards,” and then asked “How do practices in Australia measure up to [IRMA]?”
Morningstar-Sustainalytics Associate Director for Stewardship, Joris Laseur published a blog: “Raising the Bar in Mining and Minerals for the Cleantech Supply Chain: The Role of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives.”
In discussing the shift towards renewables, Mr Laseur notes that “metals need to be mined responsibly and then become part of the circular economy,” and that “two initiatives have emerged as leaders in the supply chains of cleantech equipment: Aluminium Stewardship Initiative (ASI) and the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA).”
The Environmental Law Initiative’s The Debate published a multi-sector discussion “How Can U.S. Safely Mine Minerals Critical to a Carbon-Free Economy?” which included an article by Earthworks’ Payal Sampat entitled “Transition Must Be Just, Equitable and Responsible”.
In it she recognizes that “reforms start with the rules governing mining” and that “some leading automakers and electronics companies are already asking suppliers to undergo assessments by the multi-sector-governed Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance.”
Human Rights Watch published a Q&A: “EU’s Flawed Reliance on Audits, Certifications for Raw Materials Rules”.
Even as the authors describe third-party audits as “inherently limited”, they explain that HRW is an IRMA board member because IRMA is “unique among mining sector standards initiatives because it is equally governed by civil society and the private sector.” And “the combination of IRMA’s equal governance system, its detailed standard, and its public audit reports makes it the comparatively strongest standard that mining companies can use to provide transparency on their conduct and practices.”
The Union of Concerned Scientists published a report providing “Guidance for Electric Grid Infrastructure Decisionmakers and Stakeholders.”
The report only mentions IRMA by name as a “standard that aims to reduce the damage caused by resource extraction.”
The UK’s Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy published a policy paper: “Resilience for the Future: The UK’s Critical Minerals Strategy.”
In the section titled “Resilience Through ESG Performance,” IRMA is listed as a globally recognized framework which could contribute to “role model standards for sustainable development of resources in the UK” and “protect the interests of communities and our natural environment.”
The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA) published a position paper welcoming the announcement by the European Commission of the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA).
To “strengthen the availability of critical raw materials for Europe’s industries” the paper recommends “assessing the suitability of initiatives such as the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance.”
The International Platinum Group Metals Association (IPA) published a webpage “Responsible mining and sourcing” and an associated case study of the Unki mine’s IRMA audit.
In explaining their dedication to responsible sourcing they declare that the mining members of the IPA have committed to be independently audited against the IRMA Standard or one other standard.
The leaders of Natura & Co. and WWF International during the World Economic Forum (WEF) at Davos published “Why business and finance should prioritise a nature-positive Amazon” on the WEF website.
In describing global importance of the Amazon, its severe degradation and mining’s ongoing role in that decline, the authors call upon “business and finance to promote certification by Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance.”
Philippe Varin, commissioned by the French Ministries of Ecological Transition and Industry to produce a Jan 2022 report on securing energy transition minerals for French industry, was interviewed by Euractiv.
In stressing that “mines should be responsible by complying with the ‘clearest and most binding standards possible’, he included “the standard proposed by the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance, comprising environmental impacts, works’ health, respect for human rights, and financials transparency in the mining sector.”
The World Wildlife Fund International issued the report: “The Future is Circular: Circular Economy and Critical Minerals for the Green Transition.”
The authors acknowledge the need for continued primary extraction and call for change of course towards a less harmful mineral supply. IRMA is described in this section, being the only mining standard mentioned, as providing “a verification and certification for a more socially and environmentally responsible mining.
The German Association of the Automotive Industry (VDA) which represents more than 620 companies submitted public comment regarding the EU Critical Raw Materials Act to the European Commission endorsing IRMA:
“[The VDA member companies] are committed to greater transparency, respect for human rights and the sustainable extraction of raw materials. Therefore, the EU CRMA Raw Materials Act should support the IRMA as the recommended industry standard for mining.”
Transport & Environment Clean Vehicles Director Julia Poliscanova was quoted in an article sharing three pillars which must be part of the European Union’s Critical Raw Materials Act.
In addition to recommending any mines in Europe meet best-practice standards, she noted: “Although domestic production is the goal, imports will be inevitable. It means transparent and diverse markets, supported by strong sustainability standards such as the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA), are key to guaranteeing responsible supply.”
Germanwatch published “An Examination of Industry Standards in the Raw Materials Sector.”
Germanwatch determined that, unlike all other evaluated standards, IRMA satisfied the majority of its evaluation metrics. Regarding audits in they remarked, “we should emphasise in particular here the certification report by IRMA, which provides detailed and differentiated information about the knowledge acquired within the scope of the audit and sheds light on details on the state of implementation [where others do not]. IRMA shows that transparent communication is possible.”
Germany’s Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) authored the report: “Sustainability Standard Systems for Mineral Resources: A Comparative Overview.”
When comparing IRMA to other standards the authors noted: “In contrast, IRMA [has] a stronger focus on social aspects which might be also a result of the strong multi-stakeholder approach.”
Re-Sourcing—a three-year project funded by the European Commission highlighted IRMA as one of four good practice cases in the mobility sector, titled: “Responsible Procurement of Minerals by Using a Strong Standard.”
As part of this case study, IRMA and BMW discussed the unique elements which make IRMA a strong standard and noted how companies can use IRMA in assessing their supply chains.
The White House’s First Stakeholder Convening on Mining Reform invited IRMA’s Executive Director Aimee Boulanger.
Joining 20 representatives from states, Tribes, the mining industry, environmental groups, labor unions, automakers and legal experts at the White House, they discussed the need for reforms and improvements to establish strong standards that would allow for the responsible development of hardrock minerals in the United States
IUCN of The Netherlands published an article commending the European Parliament’s resolution regarding IRMA.
The article expresses “hopes the Netherlands will promote certification with this demanding standard for responsible mining.
IUCN NL therefore encourages companies to publicly commit to [independent] standards, especially the progressive IRMA Standard.
This standard was developed by a multi-sector coalition consisting of mining companies, purchasing companies (such as jewelers and electronics manufacturers), NGOs, labour unions and mining affected communities. Also, IUCN NL and its partner organizations that are committed to the protection of vulnerable ecosystems have actively provided input during the consultation rounds.”
Several of the world’s leading ocean advocates sent an open letter to the Biden administration, requesting presidential support of a moratorium on deep seabed mining.
In addition to this request, the group asked for the government to “take steps to meet the demand for critical minerals through sustainable, circular economy policies, including advanced recycling and domestic processing paired with mining reform and better international sourcing requirements, such as the IRMA Standard.”
There is a solution available to detect and mitigate problems more readily, but it has not yet made its way in the diamond sector. I refer to the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance, which is the only third-party, arms-length certification of industrial scale mining for all mined materials that is co-created and governed equitably by the private sector, local communities, civil society, and workers. The KP CSC calls for IRMA certification for all industrial diamond mines.”
The European Parliament passed a resolution on a European strategy for critical raw materials.
In the document, the parliament “welcomes the EU’s commitment to responsible and sustainable sourcing and encourages the Commission to take the Standard for Responsible Mining developed by the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance as a starting point, […] stressing the need to mobilise more state and private actors to also subscribe to and implement sustainability standards.”
This standard was developed by a multi-sector coalition consisting of mining companies, purchasing companies (such as jewelers and electronics manufacturers), NGOs, labour unions and mining affected communities. Also, IUCN NL and its partner organizations that are committed to the protection of vulnerable ecosystems have actively provided input during the consultation rounds.”
The Kimberley Process Civil Society Coalition (KP CSC) gave the first speech at the Kimberley Process Plenary, [i] opening the forum with a “reality check.”
In his address, Shamiso Mtisi, stated, “This forum has often discussed the challenges related to artisanal and small-scale mining. Yet, in our view it has not given sufficient attention to those associated with large-scale mining.
Problems with industrial mines are less common, but if things go wrong, the impact tends to be much more devastating and leaves communities powerless in a David v. Goliath battle with colossal corporate interests.
There is a solution available to detect and mitigate problems more readily, but it has not yet made its way in the diamond sector. I refer to the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance, which is the only third-party, arms-length certification of industrial scale mining for all mined materials that is co-created and governed equitably by the private sector, local communities, civil society, and workers. The KP CSC calls for IRMA certification for all industrial diamond mines.”
170+ signatories from human rights and environmental organizations, grassroots communities and unions from 30 countries worldwide sent a declaration to COP 26 climate negotiators, calling on them to commit to centering human rights and environmental impacts of mining, including for battery minerals.
The groups also urged negotiators to prioritize low-impact circular economy solutions and ensure responsible minerals sourcing through “adherence to stringent international environmental and human rights standards with independent, third-party verification of compliance, such as the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining.”
The Kimberley Process Civil Society Coalition (KP CSC) (the umbrella organization that acts as an observer of the Kimberley Process on behalf of civil society) shared a press release urging diamond and jewelry businesses genuinely committed to responsible diamond sourcing to endorse four commitments.
Among these is the commitment to undertake on-going, proactive and reactive due diligence of their supply chains. To do so, the group recommended using IRMA as a “promising standard,” stating, “IRMA offers the only third-party, arms-length certification of industrial-scale mine sites for all mined materials that is co-created and governed equitably by the private sector (mining and purchasing), local communities, civil society, and workers.”
The Green European Foundation shared an agenda for action aimed at charting a course towards responsible sourcing of metals for a green and digital Europe.
In the section on responsible sourcing, the authors recommend, “The European Commission should only recognize due diligence schemes that are based on the highest standards, such as those of the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA).”
SUMEX (Sustainable Management in EXtractive Industries – a three-year project funded by the European Commission) announced the release of a report describing the sustainability aspects that should be considered for the European extractive industry in the fields of carbon neutrality and circular economy.
The organization noted, “the project suggests one common standard to describe what responsible extraction should mean in the EU and suggests to use the IRMA Standard to describe the criteria that a responsible extractive operation should fulfill today.”
The European Environmental Bureau and Friends of the Earth Europe published “Green Mining is a Myth,” a study illustrating how the EU is extracting and consuming a dangerous proportion of the world’s limited resources, with serious consequences.
In the report, the groups name IRMA as “the leading standard on good mining practices” and call for “mandatory IRMA certification for the metal and mineral mining sector through the EU Taxonomy Regulation” and go on to clarify that “unlike weaker standards (e.g. CERA, UNGP, OECD Guidelines), IRMA certification happens at the mine site, rather than the company-level, and follows a step-by-step approach as opposed to a pass or fail one. This breakdown provides better transparency about each activity and prevents companies from making overarching claims about their operations.”
A group of over 150 civil society organizations from five continents sent a letter to the International Energy Agency, urging the organization to transform its flagship World Energy Outlook report, putting a 1.5°C scenario at the center.
Among the six specific requests collectively made by the group was the following: “Ensure equity and justice with regard to minerals sourcing for clean energy technologies through recycling, circular economy solutions and independent, verifiable responsible mining criteria such as the IRMA Standard.”
IUCN unveiled a plan to develop a collaborative certification system to ensure that the changes resulting from Nature-based Solutions for Societal Challenges (NbS) are truly sustainable.
Under IUCN’s NbS certification system, business entities interested in obtaining certification of their Nature-based Solutions intervention will be able to apply for certification through one of several existing sustainability certification schemes recognised by IUCN, namely the Forest Stewardship Council, the Gold Standard, the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance, FairTrade International, and the Global Sustainable Tourism Council.
Denis Hayes the coordinator of the original Earth Day, a former director of what became the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and the founder of Earth Day Network penned an opinion piece for the Seattle Times on the risks of expanding the Copper Mountain Mine tailings dam in British Columbia without an environmental assessment.
In the piece, Denis Hayes relayed, “To be clear, I am not opposed to mining, and I am not opposed to the Copper Mountain Mine. Humankind desperately needs a green-energy revolution, and copper will be indispensable. Leading brands that purchase mined materials, including Microsoft, BMW and Ford Motor Company, know this and are committing to using the rigorous environmental standard hosted by the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance. B.C. needs to catch up to such voluntary measures by adopting and enforcing protective regulations for Washington watersheds and communities downstream.”
The environmental NGO Earthworks published “Just Minerals,” a report focused on safeguarding community rights, sacred places, and public lands from the push for mining expansion.
In their findings, the authors note the importance of market pressure for incentivizing more responsible mining, noting: “Even with effective regulation, mineral sourcing is most responsible when pressure comes from mineral purchasers who see value in better environmental and social governance (ESG). Market pressure has driven a proliferation of voluntary certification programs of varying efficacy for nearly each link in mineral supply chains. For industrial-scale mining, the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) sits at the forefront of generating this market value.”
Conservation Northwest recommended IRMA in an E&E News article about concerns being voiced by U.S. government representatives and nonprofit leaders regarding the flow of pollution from Canadian mines into transboundary watersheds.
The article concludes by sharing perspectives of Mitch Friedman, Director of Conservation Northwest, who is quoted saying: “We need to figure out how to save the sky without destroying our waters. We need better mining.”
The reporters add, “He advocated for mining policies that reflect the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance. IRMA provides independent certification to verify mines have sound environmental, human rights and social standards.”
B Lab published the statement “Approach to Controversial Issues and B Corp Certification – Mining Industry.”
The statement requires a mining company’s operations to achieve IRMA 50 to be certified as a B Corp, and to achieve IRMA 75 within six years of initial B Corp Certification to retain B Corp Certification.
The statement adds, “achievement of IRMA 50 represents a relatively significant level of achievement, and IRMA’s multiple tiered approach is designed to enable continuous improvement over time.”
The White House published a report “Building Resilient Supply Chains, Revitalizing American Manufacturing, and Fostering Broad-Based Growth.”
In the report, both the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Department of Defense reference the IRMA Standard as a road map for best practices in mining, saying “IRMA may provide a method for U.S. companies and the Federal Government to ensure that minerals are being sourced from mines with robust environmental, social, and financial responsibility policies, and also could provide a model for responsible development of additional mines in the United States.”
Earthworks and Transportation & Environment published an Op-Ed in Euractiv on the importance of building a circular metals economy focused on recycling, reuse, and reduced demand, avoiding new mining to the greatest extent possible.
That said, if new mining is to occur, both Earthworks and Transport & Environment concurred: “Mining operations must adhere to stringent environmental and human rights standards (such as those developed by the multi-stakeholder Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance) with independent, third-party assurance of compliance.”
Allen Edzerza, a representative of the First Nations Energy & Mining Council spoke at the Wall Street Green Summit emphasizing the importance of including the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples when considering ESG (environmental, social and governance) factors.
In this venue, he noted: “[IRMA] is the only standard that recognizes the rights of indigenous people whose lands and culture are impacted by exploration and mining projects and has the mandatory requirement of adherence to the UN Declaration Principle of Free, Prior and Informed Consent. If you are an exploration junior, or you are a producer, and you want to show your shareholders you have a demonstrable and verifiable ESG program in your exploration or mining project for critical minerals and metals, then you must have or be on the pathway to IRMA-type certification.”
The US-based environmental NGO Earthworks published the report “Recharge Responsibly“ to inform downstream users of key environmental, social, and governance issues associated with the extraction and processing of the three battery metals—lithium, cobalt and nickel.
In the report’s recommendations, they call on companies in the EV vehicle battery supply chain to commit to sourcing from “operations [which] adhere to stringent international environmental and human rights best-practice standards (such as those developed by the multi-stakeholder Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance).”
The UK-based NGO War on Want published the report “A Material Transition: Exploring supply and demand solutions for renewable energy minerals” examining the impacts associated with the extraction of transition minerals. They called for international solidarity with those impacted by transition minerals, advancing initiatives focused on fair and just global supply chains, and a reduction in unsustainable material consumption.
In detailing the various certification systems for the mining industry, the authors describe IRMA as “a genuinely multi-stakeholder certification scheme to develop ambitious standards that improve the social and environmental performance of industrial mining operations, including a comprehensive list of issues featuring human rights due diligence.”
The Zimbabwe Environmental Law Association published “Anglo American company under the microscope” reacting to the audit report of Anglo American’s Unki mine in Zimbabwe, released in February 2021.
While there were both commendations and critiques of the mine’s performance, the opening paragraph of the piece demonstrates the value IRMA provides communities: “Anglo American’s Unki platinum mine operating in Zimbabwe’s move to be assessed against the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) comprehensive mining standard has been welcomed by locals as a reflection of the company’s commitment to transparency and responsible mining.”
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Marrakech Partnership published a vision of how the Metals and Mining sector, among others, could achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 while making continuous improvements in their ESG performance.
In laying out the milestones, the authors envision that by 2025, “major mining companies have all of their mines independently verified as reducing GHG emissions/energy use and are measured against leading external ESG standards (e.g. IRMA).”
The ISEAL Alliance published “Voluntary standards and FPIC: Insights for improving implementation,”a report to support sustainability standards systems in improving the effectiveness of implementing FPIC (Free, Prior and Informed Consent).
The report references past findings and notes: “MacInnes et al (2017) consider IRMA to be the most promising of extractive industry multi-stakeholder initiatives involving Indigenous peoples. IRMA recognized early on the importance for indigenous peoples to be directly represented as a key stakeholder in negotiations, rather than a subgroup of NGOs, and the multi-stakeholder approach to the development of the standard has helped in addressing issues such as FPIC.”
The New York Declaration on Forests published “Balancing forests and development: Addressing infrastructure and extractive industries, promoting sustainable livelihoods,” a report on the urgency of balancing forest protections and development, noting that in the authors’ review of mining certification standards, IRMA was found to be “a top performer,” going on to say: “Only IRMA’s Standard for Responsible Mining provides detailed guidance and certification for mining operations and explicitly calls for the identification of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects on biodiversity and ecosystem services.”
The Institute for Sustainable Futures (University of Technology Sydney) and the University of Melbourne published “Certification and LCA of Australian Battery Materials – Drivers and Options,” a study assessing the merits of various certification schemes in conjunction with efforts to demonstrate Australian materials are produced in accordance with best practices.
The report noted: “Several interviewees noted the advantages of the IRMA scheme. These included that they considered the IRMA certification process to be ‘most thorough’ and ‘best standard and process,’ and ‘the most comprehensive of existing schemes.’ One noted that the ‘standard is very high, in terms of social and environmental impacts; integrity really shows.’”
Based on these interviews and the authors’ own research, they concluded that “IRMA is ready for mine site certification now, and appears to offer more advantages (transparency, governance, clear processes), [and] appears to offer a no-regrets approach.”
OKT Law Firm, a team of lawyers dedicated to advocating for Indigenous communities in Canada issued “Raising the Stakes – A Comparative Review of Canadian Mining Laws and Responsible Mining Standards,” a detailed report comparing selected components of mining regimes throughout the country to IRMA’s requirements—the first analysis of its kind.
The authors note: “Comparing [laws and policies] to the IRMA Standard is important in evaluating the extent to which the mining law regime in each jurisdiction reflects best practices.” They also note: “IRMA’s standards are a pioneering example of how best to address environmental and social issues in mining.”
The Sierra Club adopted “Mining and Mining Law Reform Policy (including minerals for Clean Energy),” its first mining policy.
While the policy recommends mining be kept to a minimum, it also states that “where mining is necessary, it must be compliant with high-bar environmental and human rights standards such as IRMA’s Standard for Responsible Mining.”
Human Rights Watch shared a public letter with South Africa’s new administration, calling for bold and concrete steps to protect human rights.
In the letter, IRMA was called out as an “unprecedented international collaboration” and recommended as a way to drive improved performance at mines.
A group of 28 NGOs and trade unions sent an open letter to the Responsible Jewellery Council, recommending the adoption of relevant requirements from IRMA on several topics, including:
- Water Quality and Quantity
- Mine Waste Management
- Air Quality
- Noise
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Biodiversity and Protected Areas
- Cyanide
- Mercury
- Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
- Reclamation and Closure
The BC Mining Law Reform Network published “A Plan of Action for Change,” to provide recommendations for reform of British Columbia’s mining laws.
Of the 69 recommendations, four reference IRMA directly:
- Require that all mines in BC comply with the IRMA standards, or better, for Waste and Materials Management.
- Enact measurable and enforceable reclamation criteria that meet or exceed the international standards set in IRMA’s Standard for Responsible Mining.
- Adopt the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining water management standards as minimum requirements in BC’s mining laws, including full consultation with communities and stakeholders on critical water-related issues, with third party independent reviews.
- Prohibit mines that are likely to require perpetual water treatment unless the mine meets the exceptional circumstances set out in the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining.
Over 50 NGOs sent a joint letter to the World Bank in support of a just and rapid transition towards a renewable energy economy, while also expressing concerns about impacts from an expected increase in mining to enable the transition.
The group noted that “where sourcing from mining operations is absolutely necessary, purchasers must insist that those operations adhere to stringent international environmental and human rights best-practices standards (such as those developed by the multi-stakeholder Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance) with independent, third-party assurance of compliance.”
WWF Germany released “Boom in Raw Materials: Between profits and losses,” a report recommending specific steps to manage the impacts of steel and aluminum production.
Throughout the report, IRMA is singled out as a credible certification scheme for advancing best practices at the mine.
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) issued “Standards and the Extractive Economy,” a report assessing 15 voluntary sustainability initiatives in mining, developing rankings across environmental, social and business related considerations.
In its conclusion, IISD noted, “IRMA comes closest to providing a comprehensive mining standard covering every societal indicator relevant to mining.”
Indigenous leaders in British Columbia authored “Time for Mining to Clean Up Its Act” an Op-Ed in the Vancouver Sun, making it clear that business as usual is not an option when it comes to current mining industry practices and related regulations.
In the piece, these community leaders shared: “An increasing number of organizations are signing on to the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance’s (IRMA) Standard for Responsible Mining, which seeks to emulate for industrial-scale mine sites what has been done with certification programs in organic agriculture, responsible forestry and sustainable fisheries. “Owners of mines that fail to meet the standard, which includes social and environmental responsibility and third-party verification, risk being bypassed as suppliers in much the same way that B.C. forestry companies were shunned until they improved their logging practices.”
Germany’s Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) authored “Sustainability Schemes for Mineral Resources,” a comparative overview of 19 sustainability schemes for mineral resources.
In their analysis, the authors noted: “The IRMA standard is different from other standards because it is not restricted to certain commodities and its best practice requirements are recognized by both civil society and large companies. The Standard for Responsible Mining is already said to become the most comprehensive and legitimate catalogue of requirements among all schemes due to its long, intense and democratic stakeholder involvement into the standard-setting process.”
Public Citizen and other organizations sent a letter to the ICMM, CopperMark, the Mining Association of Canada, and the World Gold Council expressing concerns over their Consolidated Mining Standard Initiative.
In doing so they “recognize that strong voluntary standards can help drive improved mining industry human rights and environmental performance if they have the level of transparency and rigor necessary to provide credible information,” and provides criteria that such a standard must meet.
As an example, the letter recognizes only IRMA by name: “There are existing standards, notably IRMA, that meet many of these criteria.”
The Just Transition Finance Lab at the London School of Economics submitted comments to the UN Secretary-General’s Panel on Critical Energy Transition Minerals in response to the Panel’s call for input to inform its development of principles and actionable recommendations.
The comments uniquely highlight IRMA “for its assurance system that includes public notice of audits in a sustained effort to hear all voices, and makes use of offsite audit interviews to acquire a holistic view of mine performance.” It also mentions that “IRMA’s governance is uniquely aligned with the just transition principle of centering the voices of affected workers and communities …. Most other standards only involve stakeholders outside of the mining sector through more detached consultation processes. A systematic and comprehensive overview of global mining standards found IRMA to have among the highest quality of governance structure, auditing and transparency.”
Eramet announced its Centenario direct lithium extraction plant in Argentina.
In doing so Eramet restated its commitment to “subject all its mining operations to an independent audit process based on the IRMA Standard. It is the first international standard for the mining sector with a global approach, including environmental, social and governance aspects of mining operations. By engaging stakeholders from various sectors, including communities, NGOs and industry experts, IRMA ensures a holistic perspective that addresses diverse concerns and promotes transparency throughout the mining supply chain. The Centenario site completed its self-assessment in 2022 and is preparing for an external audit scheduled for the beginning of 2025.”
Mighty Earth released a new report “The Impact of the Bauxite Boom on People and the Planet.”
In the accompanying press release “Mighty Earth calls for all actors across the bauxite supply chain to join the Initiative for Responsible Mining (IRMA) and adopt its standards. IRMA is the only independent third-party program for assessing industrial scale mine sites for all mined materials. It is governed equally by the private sector, communities, civil society, and workers.”
Tesla published its “Impact Report 2023.”
It declares that “The Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) Standard is Tesla’s preferred mining standard. IRMA is a multi-stakeholder led organization with the most comprehensive mining certification system and transparent reporting of results available. Its focus on continuous improvement allows suppliers to improve their results over time. Tesla has been an IRMA member since late 2021. Our goal is to encourage the uptake of IRMA across our supply chain.”
Rainforest Foundation Norway and AidEnvironment released the report “Short Circuits: Exploring the broken links of mineral supply chain policies in the electric vehicle industry.”
In looking at third-party assurance, the report highlights that “only the IRMA standard is contingent on FPIC.” With respect to mining and sensitive ecosystems, the report mentions “the IRMA mining standard expands those commitments [not to mine in legally protected areas] by establishing as a requirement that mining projects should not adversely affect IUCN protected area management categories I-III, and core areas of UNESCO Biosphere reserve.”
The Business & Human Rights Resource Center published “Transition Minerals Tracker: 2024 Analysis.”
The report declares “The standard developed by the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) represents the most comprehensive, transparent, and credible mining sector audit standard available today.”
The Church of England Pension Fund issued a “Statement on Anglo American and Proposed Take-Over Bids.”
The statement explained “Anglo has played a distinct role in driving best practice and was one of the first to support institutional investor calls for a different approach following the Brumadinho tailings disaster. It recognised that the social license of the sector was under threat and that the key to addressing challenging issues and building trust required multi-stakeholder approaches. It is also Anglo that has championed the development of a multi-stakeholder approach to standards through initiatives such as IRMA.”
87 Indigenous Peoples’ representatives issued the Declaration of Indigenous Peoples’ Participants in the Conference on Indigenous Peoples and the Just Transition.
The declaration includes “Companies must recognize and respect the right to FPIC, which also means the right to say no, in their policies, procedures and practices in all projects, recognizing and emphasizing the self-determined development of Indigenous Peoples. The International [sic] Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) policy on FPIC must be the minimum standard for mining companies.”
The United Nations Secretary-General appointed a Panel on Critical Energy Transition Minerals.
Composed of representatives of state and non-state actors, IRMA was included alongside other non-state actors such as the World Bank and IRMA member IndustriALL Global Union.
Cultural Survival, an Indigenous led NGO, issued a press release “Ford Sustainability Report Shows Important Progress on the Rights of Workers and Indigenous Peoples but Disappoints on Clean Steel and Aluminum.”
The release declares that “Sourcing from an IRMA-audited mine is a step in the right direction, but Ford can and should do more to leverage its influence to safeguard its supply chain from human rights and environmental harms. The next step for Ford is to publicly disclose its timeline for demanding that all mines in its supply chain undergo IRMA audits.”
39 civil society organizations submitted a letter in response to a “Request for Comments on Promoting Supply Chain Resilience” by the United States Trade Representative.”
The letter requests the USTR to “ensure that critical minerals operations meet all standards set in the Indigenous Peoples and Free, Prior and Informed Consent chapter of IRMA.” The letter also calls on the USTR to require the IRMA Occupational Health. & Safety chapter, as well as “all environmental responsibility and other related standards set in IRMA.”
Mighty Earth published “From Forests to Electric Vehicles: Quantifying and Addressing the Environmental Toll of Indonesian Nickel.”
The first recommendation of the report includes “we strongly encourage all actors to join the Initiative for Responsible Mining (IRMA) and adopt its standards. IRMA is the only independent third-party program for assessing industrial-scale mine sites for all mined materials. It is governed equally by the private sector, communities, civil society, and workers.”
Lead the Charge, a network of 14 local, national, and global advocacy partners submitted a letter to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) urging them to strengthen their upcoming supply chain standard.
Part of the letter strongly endorses IRMA, “There are fundamental criteria that standards must include to be credible and effective at protecting people and the planet. The Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) contains these elements and more, which is why there is broad consensus within civil society that IRMA is the strongest mining standard and should serve as the baseline for any global guideline on critical mineral supply chains.”
BC First Nations Energy and Mining Council (FNMEC) published “BC First Nations Critical Minerals Strategy.”
Recommendation 19 of the strategy says “First Nations, in their sole and absolute discretion, may require all mineral projects, including critical minerals projects, be assessed and audited by the world’s leading mining standard created by the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (“IRMA”). The IRMA audit process is transparent, independent and voluntary. The IRMA process is analogous to forest certification processes, such as the Forest Stewardship Council. Industry mining standards and certification schemes are biased processes and not supported by most First Nations.”
Transportation & Environment published a memo “EU Battery Regulation – Due diligence rules: what next in the implementation?”
The memo’s recommendations to companies include “Source from IRMA-audited mines, directly or indirectly.”
Lead the Charge , a diverse network of local, national and global advocacy partners working for an equitable, sustainable, and fossil-free auto supply chain released “The Race to Cleaner Automotive Supply Chains,” a scorecard of major automobile manufacturers’ supply chains assessing their environmental, human rights, and responsible sourcing performance.
In addition to using commitment to IRMA as part of the scoring rubric, the methodology of the scorecard offers that “to drive change at the level of extraction companies may join the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA). IRMA is the only third-party certification of industrial scale mine sites for all mined materials that is governed equitably by the private sector, local communities, civil society, and workers.”
29 investors managing US$1.2 trillion signed a statement demanding companies enhance their environmental and social due diligence in nickel supply chains of the electric vehicle industry.
The 29 signatories endorsed VBDO and Rainforest Foundation Norway’s investor statement which uniquely mentions IRMA as “one key initiative in this area which downstream companies can support by joining directly but also by prioritising sourcing from mines audited by IRMA and requiring their own suppliers to be audited by IRMA.”
Lead the Charge, a network of 14 local, national, and global advocacy partners published “An Assessment of Third-Party Assurance and Accreditation Scheme.”
Lead the Charge assessed IRMA as a “robust scheme” that “was the strongest performer by a considerable margin” among the eight systems evaluated, and meets “nearly all of the minimum criteria for governance, auditing, and/or accreditation.”
IndustriALL Global Union published a Mining Indaba recap “Reflecting on labour and community gains at the Mining Indaba.”
The recap described IRMA as “a valuable tool which integrated ILO standards, OECD guidelines and human rights due diligence. This integration created a culture of industrial peace, accountability, and meaningful dialogue between workers, communities, and mining companies.”
Transportation & Environment authored the study, “Pedal to the Metal: how prepared are European carmakers for EV value chain transformation.” “To Decarbonize We Must Invest in the U.S. EV Battery Supply Chain.”
One of the study’s “Key recommendations” is “quicker adoption of best-in-class global standards (such as IRMA),” the only mining standard mentioned. A company’s commitment to the IRMA Standard is used as part of the study’s “Responsible supply chain practices” metric.
Recourse and Trend Asia published “Tread Lightly: Why IFIs should put people and the environment at the centre of the transition mineral supply chain.”
One of the study’s “Key recommendations” is “quicker adoption of best-in-class global standards (such as IRMA),” the only mining standard mentioned. A company’s commitment to the IRMA Standard is used as part of the study’s “Responsible supply chain practices” metric.
The IUCN | National Committee of the Netherlands published an article “How the IRMA standard guides sectors towards responsible mining.”
The article “urges the public and business sectors in The Netherlands, the European Union and elsewhere to adhere to the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining, with an eye for the interests of both nature and people.”
Transportation & Environment , tagline “Europe’s leading clean transport campaign group,” released a briefing report “Paving the way to cleaner nickel.”
The briefing recommends “robust standards” naming only IRMA “to improve environmental and social stewardship.”
Rocky Mountain Institute authored an opinion piece in eGreenews[i]: “To Decarbonize We Must Invest in the U.S. EV Battery Supply Chain.”
As RMI discusses how to meet U.S. domestic electric vehicle battery demand, they unequivocally endorse IRMA, “Any extraction must be done responsibly and meet the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA)’s responsible mining standard.”
Oxfam America released a report “Recharging Community Consent: Mining companies, battery minerals, and the battle to break from the past” which concludes “in general the battery mineral sector’s approach to free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) is not sufficiently ready to support a just energy transition under current company policies.”
To address this unreadiness, Oxfam unequivocally endorses IRMA, “Major lithium producers need to be recognized as being some of the first to undertake credible, third-party assurance of their social and environmental performance, including FPIC implementation, in accordance with the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA).” It also gives kudos to those lithium producers that have audited their operations against the IRMA Standard.
The Alliance for Tompotika (AlTo) released a video – “Tompotika: Forests Nickel and Critical Choices” — highlighting the pressure of increasing nickel demand on Indonesia’s Tompotika tropical rainforest on Sulawesi and the threat it poses to critically endangered species.
To the extent that mining must occur in Tompotika, in the video AlTo says it “must occur according to mining best practices by applying the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining.”
The Biden-Harris Interagency Working Group on Mining Laws, Regulations and Permitting published its “Recommendations to Improve Mining on Public Lands”
It positively calls out the IRMA Standard for special attention among voluntary mining standards, “This report endorses the adoption of a number of components of voluntary standards—particularly ones from the IRMA standard developed by a multi-stakeholder coalition comprised of the mining industry, end-users, environmental and human rights NGOs, labor organizations, and others.”
The Berkeley Center for Law, Energy and the Environment (CLEE), and Ceres , an NGO working with capital market leaders to solve world sustainability challenges, published “Electric Vehicle Batteries: A Guidebook for Responsible Corporate Engagement Throughout the Supply Chain.”
The Ceres/CLEE guidebook recommends that EV battery manufacturers “Indicate a preference for batteries with minerals from IRMA-certified suppliers” and “Become a member of IRMA [to] publicly demonstrate a commitment to responsible sourcing.”
Climate Action 100+ , an investor-led initiative to ensure the world’s largest corporate greenhouse gas emitters take necessary action on climate change, published “Investor Expectations for Diversified Mining.”
In section 9.iii “Aligning with core best practices for the acceleration for of [transition mineral] mining” they suggest “that IRMA be considered the primary independent responsible mining [verification] when assessing indicator 9.iii because of its multistakeholder governance system that specifically allocates equal governing power to each of the represented stakeholders: communities, workers, NGOs, mining companies, companies that purchase mined materials, and investors.”
The University of Technology, Sydney (UTS) researchers Rusty Langdon and Elsa Dominish posted about “The Energy Conundrum” to answer the question “We could need 6 times more of the minerals used for renewables and batteries. How can we avoid a huge increase in mining impacts?”
Langdon and Dominish answered this question in part by referencing their research which “identified the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance as one of the more rigorous standards,” and then asked “How do practices in Australia measure up to [IRMA]?”
Morningstar-Sustainalytics Associate Director for Stewardship, Joris Laseur published a blog: “Raising the Bar in Mining and Minerals for the Cleantech Supply Chain: The Role of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives.”
In discussing the shift towards renewables, Mr Laseur notes that “metals need to be mined responsibly and then become part of the circular economy,” and that “two initiatives have emerged as leaders in the supply chains of cleantech equipment: Aluminium Stewardship Initiative (ASI) and the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA).”
The Environmental Law Initiative’s The Debate published a multi-sector discussion “How Can U.S. Safely Mine Minerals Critical to a Carbon-Free Economy?” which included an article by Earthworks’ Payal Sampat entitled “Transition Must Be Just, Equitable and Responsible”.
In it she recognizes that “reforms start with the rules governing mining” and that “some leading automakers and electronics companies are already asking suppliers to undergo assessments by the multi-sector-governed Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance.”
Human Rights Watch published a Q&A: “EU’s Flawed Reliance on Audits, Certifications for Raw Materials Rules”.
Even as the authors describe third-party audits as “inherently limited”, they explain that HRW is an IRMA board member because IRMA is “unique among mining sector standards initiatives because it is equally governed by civil society and the private sector.” And “the combination of IRMA’s equal governance system, its detailed standard, and its public audit reports makes it the comparatively strongest standard that mining companies can use to provide transparency on their conduct and practices.”
The Union of Concerned Scientists published a report providing “Guidance for Electric Grid Infrastructure Decisionmakers and Stakeholders.”
The report only mentions IRMA by name as a “standard that aims to reduce the damage caused by resource extraction.”
The UK’s Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy published a policy paper: “Resilience for the Future: The UK’s Critical Minerals Strategy.”
In the section titled “Resilience Through ESG Performance,” IRMA is listed as a globally recognized framework which could contribute to “role model standards for sustainable development of resources in the UK” and “protect the interests of communities and our natural environment.”
The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA) published a position paper welcoming the announcement by the European Commission of the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA).
To “strengthen the availability of critical raw materials for Europe’s industries” the paper recommends “assessing the suitability of initiatives such as the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance.”
The International Platinum Group Metals Association (IPA) published a webpage “Responsible mining and sourcing” and an associated case study of the Unki mine’s IRMA audit.
In explaining their dedication to responsible sourcing they declare that the mining members of the IPA have committed to be independently audited against the IRMA Standard or one other standard.
The leaders of Natura & Co. and WWF International during the World Economic Forum (WEF) at Davos published “Why business and finance should prioritise a nature-positive Amazon” on the WEF website.
In describing global importance of the Amazon, its severe degradation and mining’s ongoing role in that decline, the authors call upon “business and finance to promote certification by Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance.”
Philippe Varin, commissioned by the French Ministries of Ecological Transition and Industry to produce a Jan 2022 report on securing energy transition minerals for French industry, was interviewed by Euractiv.
In stressing that “mines should be responsible by complying with the ‘clearest and most binding standards possible’, he included “the standard proposed by the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance, comprising environmental impacts, works’ health, respect for human rights, and financials transparency in the mining sector.”
The World Wildlife Fund International issued the report: “The Future is Circular: Circular Economy and Critical Minerals for the Green Transition.”
The authors acknowledge the need for continued primary extraction and call for change of course towards a less harmful mineral supply. IRMA is described in this section, being the only mining standard mentioned, as providing “a verification and certification for a more socially and environmentally responsible mining.
The German Association of the Automotive Industry (VDA) which represents more than 620 companies submitted public comment regarding the EU Critical Raw Materials Act to the European Commission endorsing IRMA:
“[The VDA member companies] are committed to greater transparency, respect for human rights and the sustainable extraction of raw materials. Therefore, the EU CRMA Raw Materials Act should support the IRMA as the recommended industry standard for mining.”
Transport & Environment Clean Vehicles Director Julia Poliscanova was quoted in an article sharing three pillars which must be part of the European Union’s Critical Raw Materials Act.
In addition to recommending any mines in Europe meet best-practice standards, she noted: “Although domestic production is the goal, imports will be inevitable. It means transparent and diverse markets, supported by strong sustainability standards such as the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA), are key to guaranteeing responsible supply.”
Germanwatch published “An Examination of Industry Standards in the Raw Materials Sector.”
Germanwatch determined that, unlike all other evaluated standards, IRMA satisfied the majority of its evaluation metrics. Regarding audits in they remarked, “we should emphasise in particular here the certification report by IRMA, which provides detailed and differentiated information about the knowledge acquired within the scope of the audit and sheds light on details on the state of implementation [where others do not]. IRMA shows that transparent communication is possible.”
Germany’s Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) authored the report: “Sustainability Standard Systems for Mineral Resources: A Comparative Overview.”
When comparing IRMA to other standards the authors noted: “In contrast, IRMA [has] a stronger focus on social aspects which might be also a result of the strong multi-stakeholder approach.”
Re-Sourcing—a three-year project funded by the European Commission highlighted IRMA as one of four good practice cases in the mobility sector, titled: “Responsible Procurement of Minerals by Using a Strong Standard.”
As part of this case study, IRMA and BMW discussed the unique elements which make IRMA a strong standard and noted how companies can use IRMA in assessing their supply chains.
The White House’s First Stakeholder Convening on Mining Reform invited IRMA’s Executive Director Aimee Boulanger.
Joining 20 representatives from states, Tribes, the mining industry, environmental groups, labor unions, automakers and legal experts at the White House, they discussed the need for reforms and improvements to establish strong standards that would allow for the responsible development of hardrock minerals in the United States
IUCN of The Netherlands published an article commending the European Parliament’s resolution regarding IRMA.
The article expresses “hopes the Netherlands will promote certification with this demanding standard for responsible mining.
IUCN NL therefore encourages companies to publicly commit to [independent] standards, especially the progressive IRMA Standard.
This standard was developed by a multi-sector coalition consisting of mining companies, purchasing companies (such as jewelers and electronics manufacturers), NGOs, labour unions and mining affected communities. Also, IUCN NL and its partner organizations that are committed to the protection of vulnerable ecosystems have actively provided input during the consultation rounds.”
Several of the world’s leading ocean advocates sent an open letter to the Biden administration, requesting presidential support of a moratorium on deep seabed mining.
In addition to this request, the group asked for the government to “take steps to meet the demand for critical minerals through sustainable, circular economy policies, including advanced recycling and domestic processing paired with mining reform and better international sourcing requirements, such as the IRMA Standard.”
There is a solution available to detect and mitigate problems more readily, but it has not yet made its way in the diamond sector. I refer to the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance, which is the only third-party, arms-length certification of industrial scale mining for all mined materials that is co-created and governed equitably by the private sector, local communities, civil society, and workers. The KP CSC calls for IRMA certification for all industrial diamond mines.”
The European Parliament passed a resolution on a European strategy for critical raw materials.
In the document, the parliament “welcomes the EU’s commitment to responsible and sustainable sourcing and encourages the Commission to take the Standard for Responsible Mining developed by the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance as a starting point, […] stressing the need to mobilise more state and private actors to also subscribe to and implement sustainability standards.”
This standard was developed by a multi-sector coalition consisting of mining companies, purchasing companies (such as jewelers and electronics manufacturers), NGOs, labour unions and mining affected communities. Also, IUCN NL and its partner organizations that are committed to the protection of vulnerable ecosystems have actively provided input during the consultation rounds.”
The Kimberley Process Civil Society Coalition (KP CSC) gave the first speech at the Kimberley Process Plenary, [i] opening the forum with a “reality check.”
In his address, Shamiso Mtisi, stated, “This forum has often discussed the challenges related to artisanal and small-scale mining. Yet, in our view it has not given sufficient attention to those associated with large-scale mining.
Problems with industrial mines are less common, but if things go wrong, the impact tends to be much more devastating and leaves communities powerless in a David v. Goliath battle with colossal corporate interests.
There is a solution available to detect and mitigate problems more readily, but it has not yet made its way in the diamond sector. I refer to the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance, which is the only third-party, arms-length certification of industrial scale mining for all mined materials that is co-created and governed equitably by the private sector, local communities, civil society, and workers. The KP CSC calls for IRMA certification for all industrial diamond mines.”
170+ signatories from human rights and environmental organizations, grassroots communities and unions from 30 countries worldwide sent a declaration to COP 26 climate negotiators, calling on them to commit to centering human rights and environmental impacts of mining, including for battery minerals.
The groups also urged negotiators to prioritize low-impact circular economy solutions and ensure responsible minerals sourcing through “adherence to stringent international environmental and human rights standards with independent, third-party verification of compliance, such as the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining.”
The Kimberley Process Civil Society Coalition (KP CSC) (the umbrella organization that acts as an observer of the Kimberley Process on behalf of civil society) shared a press release urging diamond and jewelry businesses genuinely committed to responsible diamond sourcing to endorse four commitments.
Among these is the commitment to undertake on-going, proactive and reactive due diligence of their supply chains. To do so, the group recommended using IRMA as a “promising standard,” stating, “IRMA offers the only third-party, arms-length certification of industrial-scale mine sites for all mined materials that is co-created and governed equitably by the private sector (mining and purchasing), local communities, civil society, and workers.”
The Green European Foundation shared an agenda for action aimed at charting a course towards responsible sourcing of metals for a green and digital Europe.
In the section on responsible sourcing, the authors recommend, “The European Commission should only recognize due diligence schemes that are based on the highest standards, such as those of the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA).”
SUMEX (Sustainable Management in EXtractive Industries – a three-year project funded by the European Commission) announced the release of a report describing the sustainability aspects that should be considered for the European extractive industry in the fields of carbon neutrality and circular economy.
The organization noted, “the project suggests one common standard to describe what responsible extraction should mean in the EU and suggests to use the IRMA Standard to describe the criteria that a responsible extractive operation should fulfill today.”
The European Environmental Bureau and Friends of the Earth Europe published “Green Mining is a Myth,” a study illustrating how the EU is extracting and consuming a dangerous proportion of the world’s limited resources, with serious consequences.
In the report, the groups name IRMA as “the leading standard on good mining practices” and call for “mandatory IRMA certification for the metal and mineral mining sector through the EU Taxonomy Regulation” and go on to clarify that “unlike weaker standards (e.g. CERA, UNGP, OECD Guidelines), IRMA certification happens at the mine site, rather than the company-level, and follows a step-by-step approach as opposed to a pass or fail one. This breakdown provides better transparency about each activity and prevents companies from making overarching claims about their operations.”
A group of over 150 civil society organizations from five continents sent a letter to the International Energy Agency, urging the organization to transform its flagship World Energy Outlook report, putting a 1.5°C scenario at the center.
Among the six specific requests collectively made by the group was the following: “Ensure equity and justice with regard to minerals sourcing for clean energy technologies through recycling, circular economy solutions and independent, verifiable responsible mining criteria such as the IRMA Standard.”
IUCN unveiled a plan to develop a collaborative certification system to ensure that the changes resulting from Nature-based Solutions for Societal Challenges (NbS) are truly sustainable.
Under IUCN’s NbS certification system, business entities interested in obtaining certification of their Nature-based Solutions intervention will be able to apply for certification through one of several existing sustainability certification schemes recognised by IUCN, namely the Forest Stewardship Council, the Gold Standard, the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance, FairTrade International, and the Global Sustainable Tourism Council.
Denis Hayes the coordinator of the original Earth Day, a former director of what became the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and the founder of Earth Day Network penned an opinion piece for the Seattle Times on the risks of expanding the Copper Mountain Mine tailings dam in British Columbia without an environmental assessment.
In the piece, Denis Hayes relayed, “To be clear, I am not opposed to mining, and I am not opposed to the Copper Mountain Mine. Humankind desperately needs a green-energy revolution, and copper will be indispensable. Leading brands that purchase mined materials, including Microsoft, BMW and Ford Motor Company, know this and are committing to using the rigorous environmental standard hosted by the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance. B.C. needs to catch up to such voluntary measures by adopting and enforcing protective regulations for Washington watersheds and communities downstream.”
The environmental NGO Earthworks published “Just Minerals,” a report focused on safeguarding community rights, sacred places, and public lands from the push for mining expansion.
In their findings, the authors note the importance of market pressure for incentivizing more responsible mining, noting: “Even with effective regulation, mineral sourcing is most responsible when pressure comes from mineral purchasers who see value in better environmental and social governance (ESG). Market pressure has driven a proliferation of voluntary certification programs of varying efficacy for nearly each link in mineral supply chains. For industrial-scale mining, the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) sits at the forefront of generating this market value.”
Conservation Northwest recommended IRMA in an E&E News article about concerns being voiced by U.S. government representatives and nonprofit leaders regarding the flow of pollution from Canadian mines into transboundary watersheds.
The article concludes by sharing perspectives of Mitch Friedman, Director of Conservation Northwest, who is quoted saying: “We need to figure out how to save the sky without destroying our waters. We need better mining.”
The reporters add, “He advocated for mining policies that reflect the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance. IRMA provides independent certification to verify mines have sound environmental, human rights and social standards.”
B Lab published the statement “Approach to Controversial Issues and B Corp Certification – Mining Industry.”
The statement requires a mining company’s operations to achieve IRMA 50 to be certified as a B Corp, and to achieve IRMA 75 within six years of initial B Corp Certification to retain B Corp Certification.
The statement adds, “achievement of IRMA 50 represents a relatively significant level of achievement, and IRMA’s multiple tiered approach is designed to enable continuous improvement over time.”
The White House published a report “Building Resilient Supply Chains, Revitalizing American Manufacturing, and Fostering Broad-Based Growth.”
In the report, both the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Department of Defense reference the IRMA Standard as a road map for best practices in mining, saying “IRMA may provide a method for U.S. companies and the Federal Government to ensure that minerals are being sourced from mines with robust environmental, social, and financial responsibility policies, and also could provide a model for responsible development of additional mines in the United States.”
Earthworks and Transportation & Environment published an Op-Ed in Euractiv on the importance of building a circular metals economy focused on recycling, reuse, and reduced demand, avoiding new mining to the greatest extent possible.
That said, if new mining is to occur, both Earthworks and Transport & Environment concurred: “Mining operations must adhere to stringent environmental and human rights standards (such as those developed by the multi-stakeholder Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance) with independent, third-party assurance of compliance.”
Allen Edzerza, a representative of the First Nations Energy & Mining Council spoke at the Wall Street Green Summit emphasizing the importance of including the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples when considering ESG (environmental, social and governance) factors.
In this venue, he noted: “[IRMA] is the only standard that recognizes the rights of indigenous people whose lands and culture are impacted by exploration and mining projects and has the mandatory requirement of adherence to the UN Declaration Principle of Free, Prior and Informed Consent. If you are an exploration junior, or you are a producer, and you want to show your shareholders you have a demonstrable and verifiable ESG program in your exploration or mining project for critical minerals and metals, then you must have or be on the pathway to IRMA-type certification.”
The US-based environmental NGO Earthworks published the report “Recharge Responsibly“ to inform downstream users of key environmental, social, and governance issues associated with the extraction and processing of the three battery metals—lithium, cobalt and nickel.
In the report’s recommendations, they call on companies in the EV vehicle battery supply chain to commit to sourcing from “operations [which] adhere to stringent international environmental and human rights best-practice standards (such as those developed by the multi-stakeholder Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance).”
The UK-based NGO War on Want published the report “A Material Transition: Exploring supply and demand solutions for renewable energy minerals” examining the impacts associated with the extraction of transition minerals. They called for international solidarity with those impacted by transition minerals, advancing initiatives focused on fair and just global supply chains, and a reduction in unsustainable material consumption.
In detailing the various certification systems for the mining industry, the authors describe IRMA as “a genuinely multi-stakeholder certification scheme to develop ambitious standards that improve the social and environmental performance of industrial mining operations, including a comprehensive list of issues featuring human rights due diligence.”
The Zimbabwe Environmental Law Association published “Anglo American company under the microscope” reacting to the audit report of Anglo American’s Unki mine in Zimbabwe, released in February 2021.
While there were both commendations and critiques of the mine’s performance, the opening paragraph of the piece demonstrates the value IRMA provides communities: “Anglo American’s Unki platinum mine operating in Zimbabwe’s move to be assessed against the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) comprehensive mining standard has been welcomed by locals as a reflection of the company’s commitment to transparency and responsible mining.”
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Marrakech Partnership published a vision of how the Metals and Mining sector, among others, could achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 while making continuous improvements in their ESG performance.
In laying out the milestones, the authors envision that by 2025, “major mining companies have all of their mines independently verified as reducing GHG emissions/energy use and are measured against leading external ESG standards (e.g. IRMA).”
The ISEAL Alliance published “Voluntary standards and FPIC: Insights for improving implementation,”a report to support sustainability standards systems in improving the effectiveness of implementing FPIC (Free, Prior and Informed Consent).
The report references past findings and notes: “MacInnes et al (2017) consider IRMA to be the most promising of extractive industry multi-stakeholder initiatives involving Indigenous peoples. IRMA recognized early on the importance for indigenous peoples to be directly represented as a key stakeholder in negotiations, rather than a subgroup of NGOs, and the multi-stakeholder approach to the development of the standard has helped in addressing issues such as FPIC.”
The New York Declaration on Forests published “Balancing forests and development: Addressing infrastructure and extractive industries, promoting sustainable livelihoods,” a report on the urgency of balancing forest protections and development, noting that in the authors’ review of mining certification standards, IRMA was found to be “a top performer,” going on to say: “Only IRMA’s Standard for Responsible Mining provides detailed guidance and certification for mining operations and explicitly calls for the identification of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects on biodiversity and ecosystem services.”
The Institute for Sustainable Futures (University of Technology Sydney) and the University of Melbourne published “Certification and LCA of Australian Battery Materials – Drivers and Options,” a study assessing the merits of various certification schemes in conjunction with efforts to demonstrate Australian materials are produced in accordance with best practices.
The report noted: “Several interviewees noted the advantages of the IRMA scheme. These included that they considered the IRMA certification process to be ‘most thorough’ and ‘best standard and process,’ and ‘the most comprehensive of existing schemes.’ One noted that the ‘standard is very high, in terms of social and environmental impacts; integrity really shows.’”
Based on these interviews and the authors’ own research, they concluded that “IRMA is ready for mine site certification now, and appears to offer more advantages (transparency, governance, clear processes), [and] appears to offer a no-regrets approach.”
OKT Law Firm, a team of lawyers dedicated to advocating for Indigenous communities in Canada issued “Raising the Stakes – A Comparative Review of Canadian Mining Laws and Responsible Mining Standards,” a detailed report comparing selected components of mining regimes throughout the country to IRMA’s requirements—the first analysis of its kind.
The authors note: “Comparing [laws and policies] to the IRMA Standard is important in evaluating the extent to which the mining law regime in each jurisdiction reflects best practices.” They also note: “IRMA’s standards are a pioneering example of how best to address environmental and social issues in mining.”
The Sierra Club adopted “Mining and Mining Law Reform Policy (including minerals for Clean Energy),” its first mining policy.
While the policy recommends mining be kept to a minimum, it also states that “where mining is necessary, it must be compliant with high-bar environmental and human rights standards such as IRMA’s Standard for Responsible Mining.”
Human Rights Watch shared a public letter with South Africa’s new administration, calling for bold and concrete steps to protect human rights.
In the letter, IRMA was called out as an “unprecedented international collaboration” and recommended as a way to drive improved performance at mines.
A group of 28 NGOs and trade unions sent an open letter to the Responsible Jewellery Council, recommending the adoption of relevant requirements from IRMA on several topics, including:
- Water Quality and Quantity
- Mine Waste Management
- Air Quality
- Noise
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Biodiversity and Protected Areas
- Cyanide
- Mercury
- Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
- Reclamation and Closure
The BC Mining Law Reform Network published “A Plan of Action for Change,” to provide recommendations for reform of British Columbia’s mining laws.
Of the 69 recommendations, four reference IRMA directly:
- Require that all mines in BC comply with the IRMA standards, or better, for Waste and Materials Management.
- Enact measurable and enforceable reclamation criteria that meet or exceed the international standards set in IRMA’s Standard for Responsible Mining.
- Adopt the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining water management standards as minimum requirements in BC’s mining laws, including full consultation with communities and stakeholders on critical water-related issues, with third party independent reviews.
- Prohibit mines that are likely to require perpetual water treatment unless the mine meets the exceptional circumstances set out in the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining.
Over 50 NGOs sent a joint letter to the World Bank in support of a just and rapid transition towards a renewable energy economy, while also expressing concerns about impacts from an expected increase in mining to enable the transition.
The group noted that “where sourcing from mining operations is absolutely necessary, purchasers must insist that those operations adhere to stringent international environmental and human rights best-practices standards (such as those developed by the multi-stakeholder Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance) with independent, third-party assurance of compliance.”
WWF Germany released “Boom in Raw Materials: Between profits and losses,” a report recommending specific steps to manage the impacts of steel and aluminum production.
Throughout the report, IRMA is singled out as a credible certification scheme for advancing best practices at the mine.
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) issued “Standards and the Extractive Economy,” a report assessing 15 voluntary sustainability initiatives in mining, developing rankings across environmental, social and business related considerations.
In its conclusion, IISD noted, “IRMA comes closest to providing a comprehensive mining standard covering every societal indicator relevant to mining.”
Indigenous leaders in British Columbia authored “Time for Mining to Clean Up Its Act” an Op-Ed in the Vancouver Sun, making it clear that business as usual is not an option when it comes to current mining industry practices and related regulations.
In the piece, these community leaders shared: “An increasing number of organizations are signing on to the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance’s (IRMA) Standard for Responsible Mining, which seeks to emulate for industrial-scale mine sites what has been done with certification programs in organic agriculture, responsible forestry and sustainable fisheries. “Owners of mines that fail to meet the standard, which includes social and environmental responsibility and third-party verification, risk being bypassed as suppliers in much the same way that B.C. forestry companies were shunned until they improved their logging practices.”
Germany’s Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) authored “Sustainability Schemes for Mineral Resources,” a comparative overview of 19 sustainability schemes for mineral resources.
In their analysis, the authors noted: “The IRMA standard is different from other standards because it is not restricted to certain commodities and its best practice requirements are recognized by both civil society and large companies. The Standard for Responsible Mining is already said to become the most comprehensive and legitimate catalogue of requirements among all schemes due to its long, intense and democratic stakeholder involvement into the standard-setting process.”
