Monthly Archives: February 2025

Hands together at the Mototolo workshopHands together at the Mototolo workshopStandards

Standards’ role in a responsible transition for steel and mining

ResponsibleSteel and the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) are collaborating on a joint project funded by ISEAL to better understand the social impacts of the net-zero transition for the steel and mining sectors and how standards can help guide good practice.

Two project leads, Haruko Horii, Standards Manager at ResponsibleSteel, and Davidzo Muchawaya, Africa Regional Lead at IRMA, provide a short Q&A for readers to better understand the project.

Q: Haruko, what is the vision for the project?

With this project, we want to understand the social impacts of the transition to net zero and what role standards can play in guiding good practice.

The term ‘just transition’ is used by different people in different ways. We need to determine what this looks like for the mining and steel sectors. What exactly is a just transition? Whose transition are we discussing? Workers, local communities or supply chains? What is the scope of transition? These are some of the questions we need to consider.

Decarbonisation could have adverse social impacts such as job losses or displacement and significant effects on weakening the economic viability of affected communities. Initial research has shown that communities are facing significant social impacts caused by the transition to low-carbon practices. For instance, thousands of people have lost their jobs as a result of shifting from blast furnace technology to electric arc furnaces. These job losses have in turn impacted the wider community’s economic stability, community identity, and overall well-being.

These are the types of issues we aim to identify through this project, assessing how voluntary sustainability standards (VSS) can address them, identifying gaps, and outlining steps for future, more detailed work that could lead to larger-scale initiatives. We’ll test our findings by engaging with workers, unions, business leaders, community organisations, and other relevant stakeholders to identify an agreed approach and create practical guidance for players in the mining and steel industry.

Q: Davidzo, what do ResponsibleSteel and IRMA have in common, and why are they collaborating on a just transition?

We believe in the power of collaboration and mutual recognition. This project is just one of many examples of how different VSSs standards can complement and leverage each other’s work. Specifically, ResponsibleSteel leverages the assurance system of standards such as IRMA’s at mine site level, while focusing on the steel production aspects. Importantly, both ResponsibleSteel and IRMA were founded on a multi-stakeholder governance system, which has been recognised as a leading practice both by industry and NGOs. This model is recognised as best practice to ensure transparency, accountability, and inclusivity.

The collaboration specific to a just transition is born out of the necessity to ensure two hard-to-abate sectors, steel and mining, address the realities workers and communities are facing in our changing world as many existing mine and steelmaking sites face adaptation or closure. Given the varying impacts of decarbonisation across regions, IRMA and ResponsibleSteel are uniquely positioned to provide frameworks that apply across these different contexts since they are both standard-setting organisations operating globally. What is more, they are able to consider both decarbonisation and the potential social impacts of the transition at the same time.

Q: How do each of you respectively integrate just transition into your standards?

Haruko: Standards are going to play a critical role in promoting accountability during the transition, ensuring they are fair and equitable. Although there is no explicit reference to a just transition in the current ResponsibleSteel International Production Standard, there are some elements to address the transition under Principle 4: Decommissioning and Closure of sites, which requires consultation with key stakeholders to minimise any adverse impacts. In future, the scope of this principle could be expanded to address issues related to site closures, or the Production Standard could adopt a different approach by providing a Just Transition Framework giving steel producers guidelines and tools to navigate an equitable transition with workers and affected communities. We plan to discuss these approaches with stakeholders in the next phases of the project. Integrating practices into the Production Standard will help ensure the industry’s transition is both environmentally and socially just.

Davidzo: As for the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining, multiple chapters and requirements articulate what best practices could and should be for mining operations wishing to ensure a just transition for workers and affected communities. A prominent example is the requirement to involve affected communities and stakeholders in the development, design, and implementation of the mine rehabilitation and closure plan. Going beyond minimum transparency, the IRMA Standard outlines a series of requirements dedicated to the adequate estimation and financing of mine closure and post-closure. Research shows that the mining operations often leave behind environmental and social liabilities, without taking charge of costs associated with the rehabilitation or appropriate closure of the sites thereby foregoing an adequate transition.

Crucially, the role played by both ResponsibleSteel and IRMA would not be the same without their multi-stakeholder governance systems. Thanks to the decision making process that takes into account private sector players as well as rights holders and labour unions, they can ensure that the voices of all parties are heard and taken into account in an equal way – hopefully adding the “just” element to “transition”.

Q: Davidzo, who is the main audience for this project?

The main audience for this project is workers and labour unions, as workers are most directly affected by the transition. Operators, from mining companies to steelmakers, are also key since, as employers, their actions and decisions will be critical to the social impacts of the transition, alongside national and subnational governments. Local communities impacted by the transition, NGOs that aim to act in their interests and standard-setting organisations are also key stakeholders.

Q: Haruko, is there a specific geographic focus for the project?

While just transition challenges and opportunities vary from country to country and even from site to site, the project is truly global as it strives to bring the complexities of these different realities to light. We aim to engage with stakeholders across different regions during the project to hear from different stakeholders the realities of the transition in different contexts. More information on this to come!

Find out more about Responsible Steel at responsiblesteel.org. Find out more about IRMA at responsiblemining.net.

Find out more about the project background, visit the project page on the ISEAL website.

READ MORE
Standard 2.0 updated timelineStandard 2.0 updated timelineStandards

Update on the IRMA Mining Standard revision

Following the release of a first draft of Standard 2.0 in October 2023 for a 90-day public consultation, the IRMA Secretariat received more than 2,500 points of comments from 82 organizations (see previous update).

Although we had first anticipated the release of a second draft as early as Q3 2024 for a 60-day public consultation, such release is now expected for March 2025; and subject to approval by the IRMA multi-stakeholder equally-governed Board of Directors.

Standard 2.0 updated timeline
Click to enlarge.
Why is the process taking longer than planned?
  1. IRMA granted extensions to organizations that asked for more time during the first public consultation up to March 2024) to ensure all could contribute.
  2. The quality and length of most contributions required a longer processing time from our team of subject matter experts.
  3. During and after the first public consultation, IRMA received requests for additional engagement, including calls and in-person meetings, from a number of organizations (across NGOs, Indigenous rights’ organizations, mining companies, government agencies, and other industry actors). IRMA responded by engaging in all requests; this engagement occurred mainly April-July 2024, but also continued through November 2024.
  4. This lengthened process delayed our ability to prepare updated material and questions for our Expert Working Groups (see note below).
  5. A new consolidated draft was then submitted to the IRMA Board of Directors on 1st November 2024 for a 6-week review period, aiming for their approval before the end of 2024.
  6. Board members from the mining and the NGO sectors requested additional discussions about, and work on, the following topics:
    • Rationale for, and listing of, critical requirements;
    • Upstream and downstream sustainability due diligence;
    • Free, Prior, and Informed Consent of Indigenous Peoples;
    • Tailings management, especially with regard to the GISTM standard;
    • Water management;
    • Biodiversity offsets;
    • Carbon offsets;
    • Air quality and dust management.
  7. Finally, the fact that IRMA finalized and launched the first official version of the IRMA Chain of Custody Standard (with its associated Assurance Manual, and Claims Procedure and Communications Policy) over the course of the three first quarters of 2024 consumed attention, discussion, and refining time from both the IRMA Secretariat and the IRMA Board.
What’s next?

The second round of public consultation is coming up soon!

The IRMA Board, supported by the IRMA Secretariat, is working to finalize the new draft for a 60-day consultation period. This is now expected for March-April (NOTE: the Board agreeing to release the Standard for consultation doesn’t constitute endorsement of everything in the Standard It’s an invitation to the world to help further improve the new draft.)

Materials we will release in support of  this second consultation:

  1. A public report on the first consultation period;
  2. A fully detailed log of all the comments that were submitted (confidential contributions will be redacted), and the response from IRMA;
  3. The full draft Standard, that includes:
    • For each chapter: summary of the changes since the 2023 first draft; details on feedback received and proposed decision for every consultation question;
    • Applicability to respective development stages (exploration to permitting to operations) will be integrated within the design of the chapters;
    • An updated Glossary;
    • Updated annexes (including environmental quality tables);
  4. Comparative tables between IRMA Standard V1.0 and this second draft, highlighting substantial differences.

IRMA is committed to again offer opportunities for feedback from all stakeholders and Indigenous rightsholders.

We aspire to process all the comments, convene expert working groups, and meet requests for specific engagement, during Q2 and Q3 2025, so that a final Standard may be adopted as final by the IRMA Board  before the end of 2025.

We thank you all for your patience; we remain committed to working transparently on this updated IRMA Mining Standard that many are eager to use and implement.

Expert Working Groups: 2023-2024 update

Some of the Expert Working Groups that were convened in 2022 have been solicited again, while a new one was created (Mineral Supply Chain). Note that no group calls took place, and members were only asked to provide individual feedback. Details are provided in the table below:

IRMA Working Groups Status
Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (CAHRAs) Asked for additional contribution in August 2024 on the new draft Chapter on “Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Area Due Diligence“.

It is anticipated that this working group will need to be reconvened during the second public consultation.

Land Acquisition, Displacement, and Resettlement Asked for additional contribution in April 2024 on the new draft Chapter.
Mineral Supply Chain Asked for additional contribution in August 2024 on the new draft Chapter on “Upstream and Downstream Sustainability Due Diligence“.

It is anticipated that this working group will need to be reconvened during the second public consultation.

Planning and Financing for Mine Closure Asked for additional contribution in August 2024 on the new draft Chapter on “Concurrent Reclamation, Closure, and Post-Closure“.
Waste and Materials Management Asked for additional contribution in August 2024 on the new draft Chapter on “Tailings Storage Facilities and Physical Stability Management“.

It is anticipated that this working group will need to be reconvened during the second public consultation.

Water Management Asked for additional contribution in August 2024 on the new draft Chapter on “Water Management“.

It is anticipated that this working group will need to be reconvened during the second public consultation.

Circularity Solicited feedback in October 2023 when 1st Draft was released.

No particular challenge identified since.

Gender Equality and Gender Protections Solicited feedback in October 2023 when 1st Draft was released.

No particular challenge identified since.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) Solicited feedback in October 2023 when 1st Draft was released.

No particular challenge identified at that time.

Former “Greenhouse Gas Emissions” chapter has been expanded, renamed “Climate Action” and peer-reviewed by an external consultancy firm, AGS Carbon, specializing in Climate Action, Standard setting, and audits. It is anticipated that this working group will need to be reconvened during the second public consultation.

Indigenous Peoples and FPIC Solicited feedback in October 2023 when 1st Draft was released.

No particular challenge identified at that time.

Following specific request for engagement, the new draft chapter was sent to 15 Indigenous leaders from across all 7 socio-cultural regions (most of them were not previously part of the Expert Working Group). An in-person closed-door meeting was also organized in October 2024, following a request from Indigenous rights’ organizations and Indigenous leaders to do so.

It is anticipated that this working group will need to be reconvened during the second public consultation.

Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Solicited feedback in in October 2023 when 1st Draft was released.

No particular challenge identified since.

Expert Working Group Demographics

Total number of Working Groups: 11
Total number of Experts: 159 (87 male, 72 female)
Countries represented: 26

Expert Working Group 2023-2024 Gender Pie Chart

IRMA Expert Working Groups 2023-2024 Geographic Diversity

READ MORE
Standards

IRMA at Indaba: Mining Sustainability Standards interview

From the Mining Indaba website:

In this compelling interview for Mining Indaba TV, J.J. Messner de Latour, Sector Lead for Downstream Purchasers at the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA), delves into the challenges and opportunities of implementing rigorous mining standards in the African mining industry.

J.J. discusses ways to overcome obstacles, improve transparency and accountability, and align with global best practices to ensure sustainable development. He also addresses the complexity of multiple mining standards and explores whether a unified industry standard is the solution. For junior miners, J.J. shares valuable advice on adopting best practices from the outset of their projects. Finally, he offers his perspective on what future-proofing African mining means today.

READ MORE